Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges support because the amendment addresses a newly identified issue regarding whether an exoneration truly means innocence or if it results from other factors like witness unavailability.
Compensation for persons exonerated based on DNA evidence.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 6:36 AM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges support because the amendment addresses a newly identified issue regarding whether an exoneration truly means innocence or if it results from other factors like witness unavailability.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes concurring because the House amendments added unrelated processes and undisclosed appropriations, causing the bill to stray from its original intent.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because DNA technology now exists to prove innocence in cases where it was unavailable during initial proceedings, and a specific exoneration case has already occurred in the state. The legislation clarifies the process for these exonerations.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
7 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
12 stored
Adopted 2nd reading by GINGERY
Adopted 2nd reading by LUBNAU
Failed 2nd reading by NICHOLAS,B
Adopted 3rd reading by GINGERY
Adopted 3rd reading by NICHOLAS,B
Adopted Standing Committee by H01
Adopted Committee of the Whole by SCHIFFER
Adopted Committee of the Whole by BEBOUT
Filed Standing Committee by SCHIFFER
Adopted, Corrected Standing Committee by SCHIFFER
Failed, Corrected Standing Committee by SCHIFFER
Failed, Corrected Standing Committee by BEBOUT