General Government Appropriations for Fiscal Years 2024-2026
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 11, 6:23 PM
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges adoption of the amendment as a rational way to restrain state government growth while allowing the governor to choose which positions to fill.
R · S20
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker states he supports no growth in government but needs clarification on the timeline for filling positions before committing to his vote.
R · S31
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because her community has already raised significant local funds to address school needs, and cutting state support now would punish their creativity and leave them unable to finish the project.
R · S16
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it unfairly denies state assistance to a district that has creatively raised nearly half of the required funds, effectively punishing them for their initiative.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because allowing wealthy districts to fund projects locally while poorer ones cannot creates an inequitable system that discriminates based on local wealth.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because following a strict process with Mercer studies is necessary to avoid legal jeopardy and ensure funds are allocated according to Supreme Court mandates rather than political maneuvering.
D · S17
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because his district already completed a Mercer study and raised local funds, proving that wealth is not the deciding factor in their ability to proceed.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges voting yes to honor the process, arguing that shifting funds now puts a new high school at the front of the line without completing a Mercer study on all alternatives.
R · S13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues for spending the money because maintenance is insufficient to address failing buildings and safety issues caused by students traveling between facilities in Sweetwater County.
R · S02
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because moving the base away from its current location will increase response times to fires in the Laramie Range and incur new lease payments.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker expresses support for selling the parcel due to its financial benefits but voices concern about potential restrictions on hunting if the land becomes part of a national park.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes voting to move the facility out of its current district without more information and notes that state institutions were historically spread across the state.
R · S28
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because moving to Casper is cheaper, increases program efficiency, and allows staff to live in permanent housing rather than trailers.
R · S03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because moving the crew out will hurt rural communities that rely on rapid response times for local fires.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges voting against the division to resolve an odd ownership circumstance regarding property at a school in Natrona County, noting there is no net expense.
R · S29
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because he believes moving further away from federal partners will be beneficial given their recent performance issues on state borders.
R · S21
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the sale but argues that if deed restrictions are placed, they should also demand property tax payments from the federal government instead of PILT.
R · S23
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker states they will vote yes because the situation seems to require a Mercer study to properly address the property ownership issue.
R · S23
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports moving the facility to Casper because representatives of his community and fire department believe it will improve service for this state resource.
R · S01
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker encourages the amendment to pass, arguing that transferring property between state entities is constitutional and avoids unnecessary appraisal costs.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because cooperation with federal partners is essential for fire programs and resources should be located where they are most effective rather than based on district politics.
R · S20
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker objects to the sale because it is ill-timed, believes the land will become more valuable later, and cites a lack of partnership with the federal government.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to simplify mineral tax distribution formulas by removing an extra tier and applying a single formula for amounts over $155 million.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to maintain traditional values like hunting and grazing, arguing these are property rights that should be retained or negotiated with professional agencies.
R · S01
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that voting against the bill now would stop the entire budget process prematurely. They believe it is better to let conference committees work out issues and provide another opportunity for a vote later.
S08
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment to stop the sale because they believe it is time to maximize revenue for education and ensure public access through federal management rather than private ownership.
D · S17
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the sale in the budget because it provides legislative direction after previous bills and board deliberations, ensuring proceeds go to schools within a two-year window.
R · S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes removing the funding, stating that despite inflation being a hardship, the state must budget for continuing price increases to provide basic services.
R · S13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it eliminates necessary spending authority for federal funds and other specific operational costs like vehicle maintenance, utilities, and laboratory equipment.
R · S23
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the measure as a necessary step to retain long-term employees by addressing pay compression and bringing them closer to market rates.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment, arguing that the proposed pay increase is reasonable given inflation and necessary to maintain essential state services.
R · S28
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes cutting the funding, citing difficulties in retaining specialized professionals like engineers and scientists who are being hired away by higher-paying sectors.
R · S16
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment, noting that state agencies are losing professional staff to the private sector due to higher wages elsewhere.
R · S03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment, arguing that a pause is needed on wage increases to prevent negative impacts on small businesses competing with state wages.
R · S24
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a targeted solution to address pay compression for long-term employees while pausing broader increases.
R · S15
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment, stating that state agencies are struggling to retain employees who are being hired away by other organizations offering higher wages.
R · S18
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment by contrasting state employee raises with the financial struggles of families in his district who are not receiving similar pay increases.
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment, arguing it benefits tourism, construction, and agricultural workers by providing health coverage to uninsured adults.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment, arguing that existing programs cover those with disabilities and warning about loss of choice for others who may be forced onto Medicaid.
R · S29
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment, citing personal conversations with constituents in his district who need Medicaid expansion.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges the defeat of the amendment because he believes its language nullifies a separate bill that allows the legislature to determine priorities for ARPA funds.
R · S04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure ARPA funds are not returned to the federal government and can be used for road, water, health, and mental health projects.
R · S20
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker stated they will vote against the amendment because constituents expressed confusion and disapproval regarding its purpose.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe it constitutes inappropriate micromanagement of an executive agency and violates separation of powers.
R · S28
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe the existing veteran support programs are constantly underfunded despite doing a good job.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because past experience showed that splitting out the budget did not increase legislative control, and he believes the current block grant system allows for more effective decision-making without micromanaging.
D · S17
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes the legislature is not equipped to make decisions on educational matters and should avoid micromanaging the university's budget.
S10
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because he views it as a necessary reevaluation of the block grant system to fulfill the legislature's constitutional obligation to appropriate money and understand its expenditure.
R · S01
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes a land-grant university must preserve freedom of thought and allow students to explore diverse ideas without legislative interference.
R · S02
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a modest investment to preserve basic infrastructure and roads, which are vital for the economy including mining, tourism, and agriculture.
R · S31
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker votes for the amendment because maintaining roads now prevents higher costs associated with replacing them later.
R · S07
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a stop-gap solution because inflation in construction remains high and repairing roads is significantly cheaper than replacing them.
R · S12
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he questions how the money will be spent and believes there is sufficient federal ARPA funding available for road projects.
R · S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes it is better to return road funding control to the general fund rather than repeatedly asking for tax increases or appropriations.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker votes against the amendment because he believes federal ARPA funds are permissible for road use and can cover more than the amount requested in this bill.
R · S15
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a necessary step because the gas tax is unsustainable due to fuel-efficient vehicles and electric cars, requiring alternative funding sources.
R · S03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion because they believe its principle that race determines value contradicts state constitutional equality. They also argue practically that such programs have caused a lack of diverse opinion in universities.
R · S24
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a modest investment and a way to start conversations about other revenue streams needed for road funding.
R · S15
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe the office helps first-generation students from small towns feel welcome and safe at the university. They argue that eliminating it would exclude concepts rather than expand speech.
R · S21
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment based on voter sentiment against DEI policies seen in national news. They cite examples where they believe hiring decisions were made based on race rather than skill.
R · S16
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment due to concern that eliminating specific programs like Russian studies alongside DEI could reduce educational opportunities for future students. They worry about losing focus on what university education should be.
R · S31
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe DEI programs have caused more divisiveness in the black community than anything else. They state that their own family did not need such a program to feel included.
R · S04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to address a gap in services while acknowledging that larger long-term solutions are currently underway but not yet fully implemented.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because he believes private sector entities should handle commercialization rather than public-private partnerships involving state funds.
R · S19
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because he believes the governor's original budget recommendation was sufficient and questions why additional funds were added if the executive branch deemed them unnecessary.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because constituents identified housing as a critical issue, and this measure would prepare infrastructure to enable private developers to build homes for teachers, deputies, and other workers.
R · S18
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that economic development initiatives like this should be left to the private sector rather than involving state government in what he views as a gamble.
R · S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker states he cannot support the amendment because it lacks solid numbers and feels like betting the state's future on a hope rather than a concrete plan.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as an opportunity to diversify the state's economy and enable a sector that stakeholders have requested, noting that successful implementation would result in the appropriation being paid back.
R · S16
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe it is unnecessary to tie specific dollars to telling the executive branch that the capitol will be open.
R · S01
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes sending $2 million to Texas, arguing that Wyoming's own problems and law enforcement needs require the funds more urgently.
R · S04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because $2 million would be more impactful if used to help retired teachers and students in Wyoming facing rising costs.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a way to back up talk about border issues with actual financial action.
R · S07
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because highways are essential for the state's economy and repairing them is more cost-effective than replacing failed roads.
D · S17
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe it focuses on creating buildings and districts without solving the underlying problem of finding staff to operate them.
R · S16
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe there are significant gaps in emergency coverage across the state that require top-down assistance to organize.
R · S05
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to restore $20 million for invasive species control, arguing that immediate funding is necessary to prevent greater economic losses from fire suppression and lost grazing capacity.
R · S19
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe it is an unnecessary subsidy for private agricultural activities that does not address their specific local soil and fire conditions.
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports division one because they have firsthand information about cooperation issues between fire departments and emergency response divisions that this funding would help address.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because he believes there is a clear and present danger from foreign land ownership near military bases and incursions of military-aged men that requires immediate attention.
R · S23
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports adding general fund dollars but opposes removing the requirement for a private match, arguing that leveraging funds is essential to the program's premise.
R · S02
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because he has not received answers regarding why the money was requested as a second reading amendment rather than through the standard budget process.
R · S23
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because he has conferred with the responsible agency which indicates there is a need, and it is his role to respond to community challenges.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because he states that neither the governor's office nor Homeland Security requested it, and his committee is already briefed on all discussed threats.
R · S15
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill due to concerns about events at the southern borders and her family members in military intelligence, believing a proactive approach is necessary.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because he has seen money thrown at the agency that was not used properly, citing historical misappropriation and a personal story of an expert being pushed out.
R · S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill believing a major catastrophe involving weapons of mass destruction could happen, and it is the legislature's responsibility to provide critical materials for protection.
R · S02
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because similar matching fund programs have been successful in the past and help build up a major industry.
R · S29
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the appropriation because he believes state government should not act like a venture capital firm picking winners and losers with public money.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes creating a new sub-account because previous efforts focused on simplifying the budget by consolidating funds into fewer accounts.
R · S15
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes deleting the museum construction account because they believe it is necessary to address severe space limitations and storage issues at the State Museum.
R · S18
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they feel constituents have not had enough time to review or provide feedback on this specific funding transfer.
R · S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe setting aside money for future projects is more transparent than hiding funds in general accounts and prevents waiting until facilities fail.
S10
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe it is premature to set aside funds without first conducting a study on the project's scope, cost, and alternatives.
D · S17
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they view setting aside funds for future large projects as a responsible and prudent approach to planning ahead.
R · S03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they prefer a simplified budget where costs are clearly stated in bills rather than hidden across many separate accounts.
R · S04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes keeping the provision because it creates an opportunity for schools to manipulate student eligibility counts without further study by the Joint Education Committee.
R · S12
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because his school district believes they are entitled to funding from past budget monies, and he represents that district's interests.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because he wants to see how the process unfolds, despite his uncertainty that it is truly wanted or needed.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it illustrates a path toward unsustainable spending that will require horrendous tax increases, given that previous funding sources like coal lease bonuses are gone.
R · S20
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he feels it is inconsistent and wrong to reinstate specific school funding that was previously removed from the budget on the same day.
S08
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports dividing the amendment because she believes separating the funding removal allows for a standalone discussion on whether to bypass the planning process, highlighting flaws in the current system.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the division because bypassing objective prioritization and Mercer studies places the state in legal jeopardy regarding school construction lawsuits.
R · S13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the division because she believes it fails to solve the underlying problem of school funding discussed earlier.
R · S01
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker explicitly urges the body to vote no on the amendment and instead conduct an interim study.
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker states that expansion will benefit rural hospitals and healthcare providers by reducing uncompensated care costs, citing specific examples of new hospital projects in Riverton and Lander.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that failing to pass this amendment effectively tells a specific population of Wyoming citizens that their lives are insignificant and they do not count enough for the state to write policy for them.
R · S07
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that the federal funds are already appropriated and will go to another state if Wyoming refuses them, so it is better for Wyoming's economy and population health to accept the money.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment due to concerns that it will attract people seeking free services across open borders, creating a financial burden for Wyoming.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
77 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
145 stored
The amendment adds $2 million to the General Fund of the Office of the Governor for direct financial aid or expenses related to border security assistance provided to Texas.
The amendment increases funding for an external consultant to study Wyoming Department of Transportation practices and reduces other budget allocations while transferring funds to the highway fund.
The amendment adds $500,000 to the General Fund for an external consultant to study Wyoming Department of Transportation practices and procedures.
This amendment reduces a budget transfer amount from $100 million to $70 million and adds new transfers totaling $90 million to the highway fund.
The amendment adds a new section to support the creation of emergency medical services districts in Wyoming through contract analysis and regional development efforts.
The amendment adds new funding to support equipment needs related to hazardous materials and weapons of mass destruction responses within the Office of Homeland Security.
The amendment adds $8 million to the general fund appropriation for equipment needs related to hazardous materials responses within the Office of Homeland Security.
The amendment adds new funding to support equipment needs related to weapons of mass destruction responses within the Office of Homeland Security.
This amendment removes a specific line item from the Secretary of State's budget section and deletes several lines on page 9.
The amendment adds $2.9 million to the General Fund for upgrading WyoSuite and specifies that this money cannot be used for other purposes.
This amendment removes specific sections related to investments managed by the State Treasurer and adjusts the total amounts accordingly.
The amendment reduces funding for a specific section of the General Services budget by $350,000 and removes certain lines from another page.
The amendment adds new funding to the Wyoming Military Department's budget for land exchanges and a long-term lease with the Board of Land Commissioners.
The amendment removes the word 'not' from a specific section of the bill related to the Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources Division.
This amendment reduces funding for the Attorney General's office and removes certain lines from the budget.
This amendment adds funding and a new full-time position for an investigator within the Peace Officer Standards and Training Commission.
This amendment removes a previous amendment related to state parks and cultural resources funding and reduces the general fund allocation by $5 million.
The amendment adds a condition that state parks and cultural resources funding must match federal land and water conservation funds at a ratio of one to one.
This amendment adjusts funding for the WYO Water Development Office and the State Engineer's office, moving money from OTHER FUNDS to the GENERAL FUND.
The amendment adds 'grants' after 'appropriated' in a section related to wildlife/natural resource trust, indicating that funds will be provided specifically for grants.
The amendment increases funding for wildlife and natural resource management by changing specific amounts in the budget.
The amendment increases funding for wildlife and natural resource trust programs from $5 million to $20 million.
This amendment removes specific lines from a section related to wildlife and natural resource trust funding in an appropriations bill.
The amendment increases funding for wildlife and natural resource programs from $5 million to $10 million, removes certain language on page 29 lines 21 through 23, and makes other adjustments.
The amendment increases funding for wildlife and natural resource trust programs from $5 million to $10 million and removes certain lines of text.
The amendment increases funding for wildlife and natural resource trust programs from $5 million to $10 million.
This amendment removes specific lines from a section related to wildlife and natural resource trust funding in an appropriations bill.
The amendment requires the Department of Transportation to sell a state-owned jet airplane and deposit the proceeds into the general fund.
This amendment removes specific lines from sections related to the Department of Transportation's law enforcement budget.
The amendment changes funding for behavioral health services in the Department of Health by moving $16,669,189 from other funds to the general fund.
This amendment removes a previous amendment related to behavioral health funding and makes changes to specific fund amounts and sections in the Department of Health budget.
This amendment removes a specific section related to assistance and services in the Department of Family Services budget.
The amendment adds $75,000 to the general fund to buy mammoth jackstock donkeys for state lands near federal wild horse areas.
This amendment removes a specific section related to the Oil and Gas Commission from the bill.
This amendment changes the amount of funding for a specific section related to community college commission state aid, increasing it from $200,000 to $400,000.
The amendment increases funding for state lands and investments by $300,000.
The amendment adds new requirements for grants and loans from mineral royalty funds to counties, cities, and towns with specific population criteria and emergency needs.
The amendment reduces funding for the Wyoming Tourism Board and removes certain lines from the budget.
The amendment reduces funding for the Wyoming Tourism Board and removes certain lines from its section in the budget.
The amendment requires the University of Wyoming to complete a financial and operational audit of its Center of Innovation for Flow Through Porous Media before using any funds allocated for it.
The amendment adds a new condition to University of Wyoming's appropriations that prohibits the use of certain funds for diversity, equity, and inclusion programs or activities.
The amendment adds a new condition to the University of Wyoming's funding, requiring it to work with specific organizations during the interim period in 2024 to develop an agreement for transferring the operation of the Wyoming seed certification service.
This amendment reduces funding for the University of Wyoming by $3 million from the General Fund and removes certain lines related to state aid.
The amendment reduces funding for the University of Wyoming's state aid from the General Fund by $200,000 and removes two lines related to unspecified provisions.
This amendment reduces funding for the University of Wyoming's General Fund by $12 million and removes certain sections related to endowments and matching funds.
The amendment adds $2.5 million to the University of Wyoming's general fund for matching funds in ranch, rangeland management, agronomy, and soil science research.
This amendment removes specific lines from a section related to WICHE (Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education) in the budget bill.
The amendment adds $250,000 to fund a feasibility study for generic drug manufacturing in Wyoming to reduce prescription costs.
This amendment reduces funding for the Wyoming Business Council from the General Fund and removes certain lines related to that council.
This amendment removes specific sections related to the Wyoming Stable Token Commission and makes a minor change on page 103.
This amendment changes funding amounts and positions for the Supreme Court's administration.
This amendment reduces funding and staff positions for a part of the Department of Education.
The amendment adds a new requirement for the Office of Administrative Hearings to provide hearing services to community colleges.
The amendment adds requirements for a study on Wyoming gaming laws, focusing on identifying gaps that could affect security, integrity, or fairness of gaming activities.
This amendment removes specific language from Section 300 of the bill, which deals with budget balancers and transfers.
This amendment to SF0001 removes specific lines related to budget balancers and transfers, including deleting a section that was previously designated for future use.
This amendment removes definitions related to average daily membership in schools from a section of the bill.
This amendment removes funding for community college appropriations and matching funds from a section of the bill.
The amendment modifies specific sections of a bill related to school capital construction funding, including adding new funding for a high school in Sweetwater County School District #1.
The amendment changes the amount of money allocated for school capital construction projects.
The amendment modifies funding allocations for school capital construction projects in Sweetwater County School District #1, changing specific dollar amounts and adding a new high school project.
This amendment changes the amount of money allocated to a specific account in the budget.
The amendment removes sections related to benchmarks and performance compensation review from the bill.
This amendment removes provisions related to state employer-paid employee retirement contributions from the bill, replacing them with placeholders.
The amendment adds a new section to allocate $50,000 from the general fund to help the state shooting complex oversight task force hire consultants for site selection, layout, and design.
The amendment adds a new section to allocate $75,000 from the general fund for repairing and installing the Wyoming Spanish-American War monument.
This amendment allows the governor to reimburse costs for fire suppression on state military department lands using specific funds and sets limits on how these reimbursements can be made.
This amendment allows the governor to negotiate with federal authorities for Medicaid expansion in Wyoming if it is financially beneficial, but sets conditions on how funds can be used.
This amendment would allow Wyoming to expand Medicaid coverage if certain conditions are met, including federal approval and a favorable cost-benefit analysis.
The amendment adds $20,000 to the General Fund for a feasibility study on expanding the lifesaver program and assessing dementia training requirements for law enforcement and first responders.
The amendment adds funding for two full-time positions within a statewide association representing counties to enhance their ability to protect natural resource interests in cooperation with the governor's office.
The amendment increases funding for the Secretary of State's office from $90,000 to $261,000.
The amendment increases funding for the Wyoming Military Department, allocating specific amounts for land exchanges and long-term leases with the board of land commissioners.
This amendment adjusts funding for the State Engineer's budget by moving money from OTHER FUNDS to the GENERAL FUND in three separate instances.
This amendment adjusts funding for the State Engineer's Interstate Streams Division within the Administration section of the budget, increasing General Fund amounts while decreasing Other Funds amounts.
The amendment changes funding for the State Engineer position within the Board of Control Division.
The amendment adds a new section that prohibits using funds for gender transition procedures, certain hormone treatments, or abortions.
The amendment adds $250,695 to the Department of Health's budget for trauma designations and education.
This amendment removes a previous amendment related to the Livestock Board's Animal Health section and makes any necessary adjustments to totals and numbering.
The amendment changes funding allocations within the state's budget, reducing funds for one section and reallocating them to another while adding specific requirements for career-technical education.
The amendment adds a new requirement that $500,000 from the Wyoming Tourism Reserve and Projects Account be given to a public airport if it hosts national championship air races.
The amendment adds funding for a new position to coordinate veteran services for non-campus based University of Wyoming students, in accordance with state law.
The amendment requires the University of Wyoming to start submitting detailed budget requests in a specific format starting from the fiscal year 2027-2028, similar to how other state agencies do it.
The amendment adds a new condition to University of Wyoming's appropriations, prohibiting funding for gender studies programs except for current students to complete their courses.
The amendment removes funding for the University of Wyoming's Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion and related programs.
The amendment adds $250,000 to the University of Wyoming's general fund for a family medical residency practice focused on veterans' mental health services.
The amendment adds a new section to allocate $14,128,818 from the general fund for WWAMI medical education instruction and contracts while reducing other funding by $100,000.
The amendment adds a new section to the budget that allocates $14,801,609 for the University of Wyoming's family medical residency program, with an additional condition on $100,000 of this funding.
The amendment adds a new requirement for the University of Wyoming to work with the Wyoming crop improvement association and a state committee to develop an agreement for managing the Wyoming seed certification service.
This amendment changes how the University of Wyoming handles research grants and contracts, requiring that any intellectual property created with these funds belongs solely to the university.
The amendment adds $250,000 to fund a study on creating or expanding generic drug manufacturing in Wyoming to reduce prescription costs for residents.
The amendment reduces funding for the Wyoming Business Council from the General Fund by $2,000,000 and removes a specific section related to that council.
This amendment removes specific language related to the Wyoming Business Council from a section of the bill.
This amendment removes a previous amendment related to the Wyoming Stable Token Commission and makes any necessary adjustments to the budget.
This amendment modifies sections related to the Wyoming Stable Token Commission, requiring it to contract with only Wyoming-based entities when conducting business funded by certain appropriations.
This amendment reduces funding for education in Wyoming's School Foundation Program and makes changes to how certain funds are used.
The amendment reduces the number of full-time employee positions in the Department of Education by one.
The amendment adds requirements for the Department of Education to assist with a study on early childhood education and establishes a new prekindergarten education account funded by $250 million from the general fund.
The amendment adds new provisions for capital construction funding, including specific appropriations for various state projects and adjustments to existing accounts.
This amendment removes a previous amendment related to budget balancers and transfers and makes any necessary adjustments to the totals and numbering.
This amendment removes specific language related to budget balancers and transfers in a section of the bill, replacing it with '[Reserved.]' and deleting two lines entirely.
The amendment removes certain effectiveness statements from specific sections of the budget bill.
The amendment removes funding for security bollards and maquettes from a budget section.
The amendment removes the words 'maquettes and' from a specific section of the bill.
The amendment removes funding for security bollards from a section related to budget balancers and transfers.
The amendment requires the state auditor to transfer $15 million from the legislative stabilization reserve account to the highway fund.
The amendment changes the amount of funding for school capital construction, increasing it from $2,267,302 to $4,166,292 and specifies that an elementary charter school in Natrona County School District #1 will receive two parts of this funding.
This amendment modifies specific sections of a bill related to school capital construction funding, including deleting certain lines and inserting new amounts or placeholders.
The amendment modifies specific sections of the bill related to school capital construction funding, including deleting certain lines and adjusting dollar amounts.
The amendment adds a new school, '10-11 Sweetwater #1 High School,' to receive funding for capital construction.
The amendment removes specific language related to school capital construction funding from the bill.
The amendment changes how severance tax funds are distributed to different accounts over specific fiscal years.
This amendment removes sections related to mineral severance tax diversion from the bill, replacing them with placeholders.
This amendment removes a section related to federal mineral royalty diversion from the bill and replaces it with a placeholder.
The amendment changes how funds are allocated, transferring $75 million from the general fund to a stabilization reserve account and removing sections related to University of Wyoming research matching funds.
This amendment modifies certain sections of a bill related to appropriations, including removing specific subsections and making adjustments to the text.
This amendment changes the amount of funding for a specific program from $55 million to $50 million, adds provisions for unspent funds to revert to a reserve account, and removes certain sections related to large project energy matching funds.
This amendment removes sections related to employee compensation for vacant positions and replaces them with placeholders.
This amendment removes certain sections related to a previous amendment (SF0001S3041/A) and adds language about a joint minerals, business and economic development interim committee.
The amendment requires the federal government to allow hunting, maintain current livestock grazing levels, cover fence maintenance costs for livestock grazing, and ensure that these conditions can only be changed by an act of Congress when selling the Kelly parcel.
This amendment removes specific sections related to the Board of Land Commissioners' sale authorization and disposition of proceeds from the bill.
This amendment removes sections related to 'Enterprise Inflation' from the bill, replacing them with placeholders indicating that these sections are reserved for future use.
This amendment removes funding for higher education scholarships and replaces it with a placeholder called 'Reserved'.
This amendment removes sections related to employee compensation from the bill, replacing them with placeholders.
This amendment allows the governor to negotiate with federal authorities for Medicaid expansion in Wyoming if it is financially beneficial, but sets conditions on how funds can be used.
The amendment adds provisions to manage unspent American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds, requiring their reallocation to the governor's office for eligible projects by April 1, 2024.
The amendment adds a new section to allocate $50,000 from the general fund to help the state shooting complex oversight task force hire consultants for site selection, layout, and design.
This amendment allows up to $50,000 from previously allocated funds to be used for hiring consultants to help with site selection, layout, and design of the Wyoming State Shooting Complex.
The amendment requires the governor to identify 42 full-time positions in the executive branch that, if eliminated or unfilled, would save at least $3,689,196 annually and directs the state auditor to deposit these savings into specific accounts.
The amendment modifies spending policy amounts for investment earnings in two permanent trust funds, reducing them from 5% to 4.5% of the previous five-year average market value for fiscal years 2025 and 2026.
The amendment changes how funds are allocated, transferring money from a specific account to the general fund and adjusting certain financial transfers.
The amendment changes how funds are transferred from a stabilization reserve account to a public school foundation program account, suspending transfers for fiscal years 2025 and 2026.
The amendment proposes to allocate $7,516,286 from the general fund for designing and constructing a helibase complex in Casper.
This amendment reduces a funding amount for the University of Wyoming's general fund and allocates up to $200,000 specifically for the university's rodeo team.
The amendment reduces funding for the University of Wyoming's School of Energy Resources by decreasing various fund amounts and adjusting totals accordingly.
This amendment removes funding for certain programs under the Wyoming Business Council and reduces a specific amount from the General Fund.
This amendment removes a specific section from the Wyoming Business Council's funding and deletes certain lines on page 62 of the bill.
The amendment reduces funding for the Wyoming Business Council from the General Fund by $12 million.
The amendment adds a new requirement to allocate $8 million from the general fund for housing infrastructure grants aimed at attracting, retaining, and expanding Wyoming's workforce.
This amendment removes specific lines from Section 101 of the Supreme Court budget section, which deals with Branchwide Services.
The amendment directs the state auditor to transfer $20 million from the general fund to the Wyoming outdoor recreation and tourism trust fund.
This amendment changes how major maintenance funding for public facilities owned by the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission is planned and funded.
This amendment removes sections related to school capital construction funding from the bill.
This amendment adds a new subsection (d) to Section 324, allowing the Board of Land Commissioners to use money from selling the Kelly parcel to buy or invest in land within the checkerboard area in southwest Wyoming.
The amendment modifies appropriations for natural resource policy by changing how a specific fund is described and removing references to 'acquisition of' and 'maquettes'.