Cale Case

The lawmaker supports the joint conference committee report because it incorporates a Senate amendment regarding land sales, adds reporting requirements, and ensures consultation with the city of Lander.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because it permanently disqualifies individuals from public office even after they have served their sentence and become upstanding citizens, arguing that redemption should be possible.

The lawmaker supports the bill because he believes government should not be involved in intermediary money collections for organizations, as individuals can easily manage these transactions themselves.

The lawmaker opposes the motion because they believe the Senate already had a sufficient opportunity to debate and extend consideration of the bill yesterday.

The lawmaker supports extending recall rights to a specific form of municipal government where they currently do not exist, clarifying that the petition only triggers an election rather than removing officials directly.

The lawmaker opposes concurrence because the House removed language allowing public members to attend voting machine tests, which was previously agreed upon by election officials.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because it removed language allowing public members to attend voting machine tests, which election officials had supported.

The lawmaker is concerned the amendment is too restrictive because survey markers are often missing, which would unfairly restrict access to public land corners that can be identified by other means.

The lawmaker wants the bill re-referred to the appropriations committee because it involves approximately half a million dollars.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it short-circuits the legislative process and sets a problematic norm for handling large allocations, despite supporting law enforcement.

The lawmaker argues that county clerks already run excellent elections and are being overwhelmed by too many new bills, so this one should be killed.

The lawmaker supports an amendment because it helps people conducting activities understand they must be purely for charitable events.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe it is not fully thought out and casts too broad a net by including offenders of crimes that do not involve children, rather than focusing solely on protecting daycare centers from those with histories of sexual offenses against minors.

The lawmaker argues that the previous amendment overly restricts how $3 million in grant funding can be used, preventing necessary planning for future 911 system platforms.

The lawmaker supports the bill as an insurance policy against a hypothetical future where federal agents might harm constitutional rights or peaceful protesters.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he views cloud seeding as a potential violation of property rights where one person benefits at the expense of others without proven data on controlling precipitation.

The lawmaker supports the bill to prevent fraud and protect individuals whose addresses are being misused, citing personal examples of constituents harmed by current loopholes.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe it is unnecessary and reinforces strict Medicaid criteria that prevent working mothers with children from receiving services.

The lawmaker supports the amendment by comparing it to necessary government infrastructure projects like interstate highways that require state involvement to get started.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because crossing a county line is not significantly worse than staying within one, and adding extra sentences for fleeing does not align with rehabilitation goals or public safety needs.

The lawmaker supports the bill because it saves money for the state by allowing residents to keep their current license plates instead of forcing a replacement cycle, which increases government efficiency.

The lawmaker argues that political parties should weight voting members based on the number of registered party voters in each county to ensure fair representation, similar to legislative districts. They believe current systems unfairly give equal weight to small and large counties.

The lawmaker argues that the current property tax deferral program is underutilized because it requires individuals to ask government officials for forgiveness, which many find difficult. He supports this bill as a way to allow private banks to administer loans guaranteed by the state, enabling taxpayers to pay their taxes without having to disclose personal circumstances or beg county assessors.

The lawmaker supports the amendment to fund membership in an insurance legislators organization because Wyoming lacks specific staff expertise and focus on insurance issues, making this a necessary tool for consistency with other states.

The lawmaker supports the bill because peace officers are being assaulted while doing their job, and aiding law enforcement helps prevent worse situations from occurring.

The lawmaker argues that extremely large electrical loads like data centers are unique and should be taxed in a way that spreads the revenue to benefit the entire state rather than just one location.

The lawmaker supports the bill because Wyoming's public records act needs work to address large data miners reselling state records while ensuring citizens can get their requests fulfilled in a timely manner.