Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes concurring with Senate amendments because the bill extends the standards review period to ten years. He prefers a shorter timeframe of eight or nine years.
Development of education standards.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Summary for LSO115 Bill No.: HB0073 Effective : 7/1/2015 LSO No.: 15LSO-0403 Enrolled Act No.: HEA 78 Chapter No.: 122 Prime Sponsor: Harshman Catch Title: Development of education standards. Subject: Modifies process for adoption of the educational student and content performance standards. Summary/Major Elements: This bill requires the State Board of Education, in consultation with the State S uperintendent, to establish a process to accept public comments between the times of formal review by the S tate B oard. This bill requires the State Board of Education to evaluate and review the uniformity and quality of the student and content performance standards not less than once every nine (9) years. Previously, the law re quired the State B oard to review the standards not less than once every five (5) years. Comments: Amends a major program: adop tion of statewide educational student and content performance standards. The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 10:20 PM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes concurring with Senate amendments because the bill extends the standards review period to ten years. He prefers a shorter timeframe of eight or nine years.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker believes it is too early in the legislative cycle to mandate specific procedures before the State Board and Superintendent have finalized their own approach.
S18
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because the State Board already seeks public input as part of its standard business, making a legislative mandate redundant.
S03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it provides clear direction for involving stakeholders, which he believes is overdue given that they may not have been consistently involved.
R · S07
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he views the proposed language as a solution to a problem that does not exist, arguing against fixing something that is already working.
S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because he believes relying on processes that 'happen anyway' is insufficient and explicit statutory language ensures stakeholder input.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it was requested by House leadership to ensure specific language regarding public input is included in order to save the bill.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports changing the review cycle from five to ten years because the current frequency creates an unmanageable burden on the State Board of Education, particularly when multiple content areas are reviewed simultaneously. Extending the timeline allows for a better staggered approach while maintaining the statutory obligation to eventually conduct reviews.
R · H03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill and amendment because they believe it addresses expressed concerns by allowing informal input from stakeholders before initiating a formal process, based on their prior experience with such boards.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe it accurately captures the essence of what occurred during committee discussions, for which they take credit as a primary driver.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker offered an amendment to address concerns about being locked into standards for ten years by creating a mechanism for teachers and parents to provide input on specific content issues before the full review period ends.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
7 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
5 stored
Adopted 3rd reading by Harshman
H Adopted, S Adopted Conference Committee
Adopted 2nd reading by Bebout
Adopted 3rd reading by Wasserburger
Adopted Standing Committee by SEducation