Tyler E Lindholm

The speaker supports the bill to ensure brand inspection compliance as requested by the livestock board, but opposes including a requirement for slaughter facilities to track every owner because it would be overly complicated for ranchers with many shareholders.

The lawmaker supports Division Two to incorporate existing federal standards for customer identification, ensuring clear guidelines on how photo ID verification must be conducted under Real ID practices.

The lawmaker supports the bill because increasing committee membership from three to four per chamber will bring a wider breadth of experience.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment limiting diagnoses because he believes legislators should not dictate medical conditions between doctors and patients, citing his own experience with traumatic events.

The lawmaker opposes delaying the bill's effective date because it would leave three banks in Wyoming without a division of banking capable of auditing digital assets, which is the primary purpose of the legislation.

The speaker explains that the bill is supported because representatives from municipalities and cable companies reached an agreement on how to define gross revenues for franchise fees.

The lawmaker supports the bill and opposes the amendment because it addresses problems created by federal government inaction regarding military airspace issues that Wyoming must handle itself.

The lawmaker supports the bill because it allows Fremont County to establish an additional absentee polling place, thereby increasing voter access.

The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure compliance with federal law and prevent the federal government from taking over the state's election process.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment again to protect active duty military members aged 18-20 from being unduly affected by a law that requires them to be older than their peers for tobacco use.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it provides necessary financial relief to small towns struggling with road repairs after previous cuts to MRGs.

The lawmaker urges a vote in favor because the amendment clarifies differences between coal and other mining types, noting that the executive branch already has the ability to handle these matters through existing rules.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it fixes an issue for absentee voters requesting ballots from county clerks, while noting that election judges are not affected.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because existing safeguards allow for investigations if illnesses occur, while ensuring consumers are informed that items from home kitchens have not been inspected or licensed.

The lawmaker votes in favor because the state program hasn't been used since 1986, and there is no reason to keep a statute for an unused system.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because decreased drilling efforts create an opportunity to save money by restricting available funds, with a provision to restore them if drilling increases.

The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure taxpayer money is being used correctly and to address public concerns about the university's future. He argues it is the legislature's job to investigate how funds are spent.

The lawmaker supports the bill because it was crafted with input from industry and law enforcement to ensure criminals are not protected while attracting new tech companies to Wyoming.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it creates unintended consequences, specifically threatening compliance with federal election laws and potentially transferring control of elections to the federal government.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe Title 13 and KYCAML standards could negatively impact federal government operations.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe excess funds should be directed to where there is a funding hole, specifically education, rather than creating another special account.

The lawmaker supports the amendment as a reasonable compromise that reduces the publication requirement from four weeks to just one time, which they do not consider too much to ask.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because he believes voters should decide on such matters directly through elections rather than having representatives draft ballot measures for them.

The lawmaker argues that the original resolution was a necessary check on federal spending and debt, noting that predicted negative consequences have not occurred since its passage.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because raising taxes by 200% is ineffective compared to enforcing existing laws, and it negatively impacts small border towns.

The lawmaker argues that using taxpayer funds to purchase firearms from private individuals is inappropriate, noting that pawn shops already exist for this purpose.

The lawmaker supports the bill because it provides counties with a rainy day fund similar to what the state uses, allowing them to save collected taxes for future needs.

The speaker argues that creating a select committee allows for direct legislative sponsorship and vetting without routing through other committees, which is necessary to retain incoming blockchain companies.