General government appropriations.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Summary for LSO115 Bill No.: SF0001 Effective : 3/4/2015 LSO No.: 15LSO-0564 Enrolled Act No.: SEA 56 Chapter No.: 142 Prime Sponsor: Joint Appropriations Interim Committee Catch Title: General government appropriations. Subject : Supplemental appropriations for the general operations of government. This bill contains supplemental budget increases totaling $9,265,509 General Funds (GF) and a net of addition of 10 positions (1 full-time and 9 part-time). The bill also appropriates $113,217,075 in FY2015 contingent funds and $162,468,258 in FY2016 contingent funds from investment earnings. Additionally, the bill appropriates $5,342,891 in federal funds (FF); $10,698,608 in School Foundation Program account funds, $7,400,000 in School Capital Construction Account funds, and $68.2 million in other funds (OF). Specifically, this bill contains, inter alia , the following supplemental appropriations (M=millions, K=thousands) and changes for the following programs: Department of Environmental Quality – Replacement of $1.29M of previously appropriated abandoned mine land (AML) funds for air quality with GF. School Facilities Commission – Added $7.4M in major maintenance funding for school districts. School Foundation Program – Added $10.6M in School Foundation Program account funds (and reduced anticipated recapture by $3.7M) for an external cost adjustment to school districts for the 2015-2016 school year. Department of Transportation – Added $2M in mineral royalty grant funds for passing lane design and directed the Transportati on Commission expend $10M of federal highway safety funds or other identified funds for passing lanes. Department of Health – Added $16.9M FF and $676K OF for a Tribal Health Uncompensated Care Waiver. Added $4.1M in GF and $4.1M in FF to increase nursing home rates. Added $1.5M GF and $1.5M FF for services to persons with developmental disabilities. Capital construction, non-contingent funds - $40.98M OF authorized for community college capital construction projects. $735K OF for the Attorney General and Department of Agriculture buildings. $8.57M in previously appropriated funds for a High Bay Research facility at UW. Local Governments – Appropriated $8M ($3.5M from GF and $4.5M from FY2015 contingent revenues) to cities, towns and counties, split 63 percent to municipalities and 37 percent to counties. Appropriated $1.083M in mineral royalty grant funds for court security issues in 8 counties. Amendments to prior appropriations – Replaced $12.4 M in AML funds previously appropriated to the Gillette Madison project with other prior balance AML funds. Authorized the release of prior appropriations for the UW College of Engineering construction, with conditions. Increased the maximum appropriation for the Capitol complex renovation by $31M. Transfers – Stopped the transfer of $184.4M from the GF to the LSRA pursuant to 2012 Wyoming Session Laws, Chapter 26. Transferred $21.37M from the Strategic Investments and Projects Account to the GF. Transferred $9M from the Buffalo Bill dam operation and maintenance account to Water Development II account. Appropriations of FY2015 contingent revenues – Appropriated $113.2M in FY2015 contingent revenues among 34 priorities, including $37.5M to the Capitol Building Rehabilitation and Restoration account; $20M to the University of Wyoming (UW) High Altitude Training Center; $15M for UW unconventional oil and gas research matching funds, $6.4M to the cease and transfer accounts, and $5M for community college matching funds. Appropriations of FY2016 contingent revenues – Appropriated $162.5M in FY2016 contingent revenues among 16 priorities, including $37.5M to the Capitol Building Rehabilitation and Restoration account; $30M for the UW science initiative; $25M to the state facilities construction account; $20M for future state facilities in Casper; $15M for community college STEM and technical education matching funds; $8M for UW Corbett pool; $5M for surface transportation passing lanes; $5M to an industrial park savings account; and $5M for UW unconventional oil and gas research matching funds. Total, Net New Appropriations: General Fund Appropriations - $9.3 M Federal Fund Appropriations - $5.3 M Total appropriations in supplemental budget bill - $376.5M, including $275.7M in appropriations contingent upon future revenue levels. Comments: The following reports are required under the budget bill: The Department of Administration and Information to report to the Joint Appropriations Committee (JAC) on longevity compensation by November 1, 2015. The Department of Transportation to report to JAC and Joint Transportation, Highways and Military Affairs Committee on the mitigation of impacts on non-interstate highways by September 15, 2015. The Department of Transportation to report to JAC and Joint Transportation, Highways and Military Affairs Committee on the condition of state highways by November 1, 2015. The University of Wyoming to report to JAC and Joint Education Committee on an elementary education degree program in Gillette by October 1, 2015. The University of Wyoming to report to JAC, Joint Education Committee and Joint Labor, Health and Social Services Committee on nursing bachelor’s degree programs at community colleges by October 1, 2015. The University of Wyoming to report to JAC on a research aircraft budget by October 1, 2015. The Department of Corrections to report to JAC and Joint Judiciary Committee on the mother/child program at the Women’s Center by November 1, 2015. The University of Wyoming, Medical Education and Department of Corrections to report to JAC (and Joint Labor, Health and Social Services in the case of medical education) quarterly on 100 series (personal services) transfers. The Department of Health to report to JAC quarterly on Title 25 shortfalls. State Facilities Task Force to report to JAC and Joint Labor, Health and Social Services by November 1, 2015 on interim Task Force findings and final recommendations by June 30, 2016. Departments of Health and Administration and Information to report to JAC upon completion of final design improvements at the state hospital and Wyoming Life Resource Center. Joint Subcommittee Economic Development to report to JAC and Joint Minerals, Business and Economic Development Committee on its recommendations by October 31, 2015. Departments of Administration and Information and Workforce Services report to JAC by July 1, 2015 on actions taken to secure state office space in Casper. Sage Grouse Implementation Team to report to JAC, Joint Minerals, Business and Economic Development Committee and Joint Travel, Recreation, Wildlife and Cultural Resources Committees by November 1, 2015 on sage grouse captive breeding. Geologic Survey to report to Joint Minerals, Business and Economic Development Committee on recoding mineral exploration data by November 15, 2015. University of Wyoming to report quarterly to the State Treasurer on matching funds to the first lady literacy endowment and unconventional oil and gas endowment. Select Committee on School Finance Recalibration to report to Legislature on recommendations in time for consideration in the 2016 Budget Session. Department of Education to report to Joint Education Committee by November 1, 2015 on incentives for completion of the success curriculum for Hathaway scholarship eligibility. Governor to report to JAC on the exercise of 100 series (personal services) salary limitation exemptions within the text of other statutory report. The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 2:23 AM
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that the funds are necessary for a Home Services Program to help people stay in their own homes rather than entering nursing facilities, calling it a better use of state money.
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports overriding the veto because there is little Native American art in the capital, Chief Washakie is a prominent historical figure, and it is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to purchase the artwork from an elderly owner.
S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure the legislative process can function properly and allow for conference discussions with the House regarding science standards, rather than being bypassed by a budget provision.
S18
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it is a good program for individual children that was lost due to administrative changes, even though he believes they could have been more frugal.
S04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to provide $6 million in funding to cities, towns, and counties by reallocating unused AML money from a trust fund.
S03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a prudent investment choice to fund infrastructure projects in cities, towns, and counties rather than adding more money to the Permanent Wyoming Mineral Trust Fund.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports acquiring unique art that reflects Wyoming's history and community appreciation, noting the opportunity to preserve something irreplaceable.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes spending the proposed amount because they are not impressed with the artist and do not believe the paintings are worth that price.
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the purchase because the paintings represent a famous Wyoming figure who assisted settlers and was granted unique rights as a Native American chief.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to prevent binding future legislators with contingent appropriations based on uncertain revenue forecasts that may not materialize.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe current budget plans tie up too much flexibility needed for future unforeseen needs.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment, arguing that proactively planning for state priorities and saving for future projects is a necessary leadership quality rather than hiding from challenges.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it is a small amount compared to management fees and aligns with the Treasurer's enthusiasm for building his team.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe it would result in deleting $2 million from severance funds intended for passing lanes.
S04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe the Department of Health should use its existing budget flexibility rather than gaming the legislative process.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because of personal experience delivering Meals on Wheels and witnessing the benefits of home health care services.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because mitigating pine beetles also helps eliminate fires since they are a major cause of fire spread.
S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes an amendment about changing athletic divisions because Wyoming should remain a Division I school as it is the state's only university.
S14
Why they voted this way
The speaker argues the amendment is necessary because current funding fails to meet court-ordered requirements for annual inflation adjustments, which has led to staff layoffs and reduced educational quality.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The speaker opposes the amendment because he believes elected representatives, not courts, should control spending decisions and questions whether an immediate inflation adjustment is necessary before recalibration.
S18
Why they voted this way
The speaker opposes the amendment because he believes the state has already met its statutory requirements through existing adjustments and argues this issue should be addressed during the upcoming recalibration process.
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the amendment because rising housing costs in his district are forcing teachers to leave, which undermines efforts to maintain educational standards and accountability.
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the amendment because rising property prices create a financial challenge for working-class residents, including young teachers trying to find homes and put down roots.
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the amendment because she wants to prevent qualified educators from leaving the state due to high living costs that they cannot afford in her district.
Why they voted this way
The speaker opposes the amendment by arguing that current funding models already include various adjustments for inflation and additional costs, meeting the state's obligations without this specific change.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the amendment because he believes the legislature has fallen behind on required inflation adjustments since the last recalibration, eroding purchasing power.
S13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes it is the wrong approach to increase a position that was already rejected by the Appropriations Committee while contracts with key investment managers are in place.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes it inappropriately incentivizes the Treasurer to shift investments toward index funds rather than allowing independent management decisions.
S03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it aligns with the Treasurer's own plans to build internal expertise and manage risks in various asset classes, noting that the changes are already intended regardless of this legislation.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it establishes a six-month timeframe that allows contractors to secure contracts and fully utilize fire suppression funds for the winter treatment season.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because state fair equipment is antiquated, maintenance costs are inadequate to meet customer needs, and reliance on contractors has increased due to facility enhancements.
S18
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to fund artifact conservation at the state museum, arguing that without immediate funding for professional conservators, invaluable artwork will be lost.
S04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes the Appropriations Committee already allocated sufficient funds for this purpose in the general budget and that further requests should wait until the next session.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because many artifacts were donated by citizens who expected them to be preserved, and previous neglect in unheated storage requires immediate professional conservation that cannot be done in segments.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because conservation work must be contracted as a whole rather than done in segments, and additional funding is needed to hire professional conservators.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it diverts funds from a reserve account intended for future rainy days to current infrastructure projects in towns and counties, which he views as an unwise move given that many localities are already facing financial difficulties.
S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker speaks against the amendment not because local needs are absent, but because he believes the money would not be well spent in this manner.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment's intent by commending the sponsor for addressing restrictions that prevent cities and counties from building their own reserves, especially in anticipation of an economic downturn.
S04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it allows for necessary planning to develop a new website, funded by an advertising fee schedule that will create a sinking fund available in five years.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker expresses concern that a sinking fund may not be sufficient to cover website costs, preferring the focus remain on effective advertising rather than trying to recuperate funds.
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues for examining all potential alternatives before approving a one-time expenditure that could last decades, insisting the project go through the established state vetting process.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that Highway 59 has a significant increase in traffic from trucks and lacks passing lanes, creating safety risks for families traveling to college.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges support for the amendment by citing data showing a significantly higher fatality and accident record on Highway 59 compared to other state highways, calling it an urgent need.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
64 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
103 stored
Adopted Standing Committee by HAC
Adopted 2nd reading by Ross
Corrected, Failed 2nd reading by Meier
Failed 2nd reading by Coe
Failed 2nd reading by Anderson, J.D. (SD02)
Failed 2nd reading by Coe
Corrected, Failed 2nd reading by Driskill
Adopted 2nd reading by Ross
Corrected, Withdrawn 2nd reading by Peterson
Corrected, Withdrawn 2nd reading by Cooper
Adopted 2nd reading by Driskill
Adopted 2nd reading by Ross
Adopted 2nd reading by Von Flatern
Failed 2nd reading by Meier
Adopted 2nd reading by Coe
Adopted 2nd reading by Rothfuss
Adopted 2nd reading by Christensen
Adopted 2nd reading by Driskill
Divided 2nd reading by Dockstader
Corrected, Adopted 2nd reading by Dockstader
Failed 2nd reading by Dockstader
Adopted 2nd reading by Coe
Corrected, Adopted 2nd reading by Nicholas, P.
Failed 2nd reading by Case
Adopted 2nd reading by Hastert
Adopted 2nd reading by Ross
Failed 2nd reading by Wasserburger
Adopted 2nd reading by Bebout
Adopted 2nd reading by Meier
Corrected, Failed 2nd reading by Meier
Withdrawn 2nd reading by Hicks
Failed 2nd reading by Hicks
Adopted 2nd reading by Scott
Adopted 2nd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Adopted 2nd reading by Bebout
Withdrawn 2nd reading by Rothfuss
Failed 2nd reading by Meier
Corrected, Failed 2nd reading by Rothfuss
Failed 2nd reading by Craft
Adopted 2nd reading by Craft
Adopted 2nd reading by Perkins
Failed 2nd reading by Peterson
Failed 2nd reading by Von Flatern
Failed 2nd reading by Von Flatern
Failed 2nd reading by Craft
Adopted 2nd reading by Case
Failed 2nd reading by Scott
Corrected, Failed 2nd reading by Meier
Withdrawn 3rd reading by Anderson, J.L. (SD28)
Corrected, Corrected, Adopted 3rd reading by Von Flatern
Failed 3rd reading by Scott
Adopted 3rd reading by Craft
Adopted 3rd reading by Driskill
Adopted 3rd reading by Bebout
Corrected, Corrected, Adopted 3rd reading by Von Flatern
Corrected, Adopted 3rd reading by Cooper
Withdrawn 3rd reading by Meier
Corrected, Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Rothfuss
Divided 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Adopted 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Adopted 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Adopted 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Adopted 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Adopted 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Hicks
Corrected, Adopted 3rd reading by Perkins
Adopted 3rd reading by Landen
Adopted 3rd reading by Bebout
Withdrawn 3rd reading by Hicks
Adopted 3rd reading by Ross
Failed 3rd reading by Meier
Failed 3rd reading by Meier
Divided 3rd reading by Landen
Corrected, Adopted 3rd reading by Landen
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Landen
Failed 3rd reading by Case
Adopted 3rd reading by Case
Failed 3rd reading by Pappas
Adopted 3rd reading by Ross
Failed 3rd reading by Ross
S Adopted, H Adopted Conference Committee