Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because the access issue is unclear and could unintentionally restrict landowners from stopping voluntary public hunting or fishing access in the future.
Large project funding.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Summary for LSO115 Bill No.: SF0044 Effective : 3/4/2015 LSO No.: 15LSO-0311 Enrolled Act No.: SEA 47 Chapter No.: 132 Prime Sponsor: Select Natural Resource Funding Committee Catch Title: Large project funding. Subject: Wildlife and Natural Resource Funding Projects Summary/Major Elements: Wyoming’ s Wildlife and Natural Resource Funding Act was created in 2005 to fund a trust account which is to be used for the improve ment and maintenance of Wyoming’ s wildlife habitat and the conservation, maintenance, protec tion and development of Wyoming’ s wildlife resources, environmen t and natural resource heritage. The Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resource Trust Account Board receives project grant proposals and approves them for f unding. A ll projects with a cumulative grant total in excess of $200,000 must be approved by the Legislature . This legislation approves 5 new projects for funding , including one conservation easement . The legislation requires the S tate of Wyoming be included as a third party beneficiary in any conservation easement entered pursuant to the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resources Funding Act. It also requires that the S tate be given the right to enforce the terms of the conservation easements and recoup the S tate’s pro-rata share of funds provided fo r the creation of the easements. Before any funds can be distributed to any project, the persons receiving the funds must certify that no gratuities or kickbacks have been made in connection with the project’s funding . he new projects approved for funding are: Beaumee/Heward Ditch Neonatal Mule Deer II Bolton Creek III Little Snake River Fisheries Little Laramie Conservation Easement The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 4:52 AM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because the access issue is unclear and could unintentionally restrict landowners from stopping voluntary public hunting or fishing access in the future.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because state money is being invested in these projects and it seems reasonable to maintain existing access that landowners already allow.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it may cause landowners to immediately close their lands to the public to avoid future restrictions, and argues that access is a separate issue from the bill's goal of protecting habitat.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it inappropriately restricts how a private landowner can use their own property and confuses the issue of conservation easements.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because future research might require limiting access for wildlife protection, which would conflict with a statutory requirement to maintain historical access levels.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment by clarifying that it does not require new public access but simply protects existing access using state funds, which is distinct from other trust account laws.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
6 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
2 stored
Failed 3rd reading by Halverson
Withdrawn 3rd reading by Jaggi