Eli D Bebout
S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports voting aye because they can accept the House's reduction of funding from $100,000 to $75,000 and appreciate the clarification language regarding existing maintenance.
Study on management of public lands.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Summary for LSO115 Bill No.: SF0056 Effective : 3/10/2015 LSO No.: 15LSO-0336 Enrolled Act No.: SEA 78 Chapter No.: 192 Prime Sponsor: Select Federal Natural Resource Management Committee Catch Title: Study on management of public lands. Subject: Requiring a study on the management of public lands in Wyoming by the S tate of Wyoming. Summary/Major Elements: This bill requires the Office of State Lands and Investments to commission a study addressing the management of specified federally administered public lands in Wyoming by the S tate of Wyoming. This bill authorizes the Office of State Lands and Investments to engage the services of research or consulting firms as necessary to develop the study. This bill requires the Office of State Lands to provide a final report to the Select Federal Natural Resource Management Committee no later than November 30, 2016. This bill requires the Select Federal Natural Resource Management Committee to consider the study and develop any necessary legislation in response to the study. This bill appropriates $ 75 ,000 from the G eneral F und to the Office of State Lands and Investments for the purpose of commissioning the study and hiring consultants to assist in the study. Comments: Requires a report. The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 4:30 AM
S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports voting aye because they can accept the House's reduction of funding from $100,000 to $75,000 and appreciate the clarification language regarding existing maintenance.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the study because it is necessary to determine if Wyoming would be better off managing public lands compared to federal management.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the study but believes state agencies have sufficient expertise to conduct it without additional appropriations.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports changing the language because a private company cannot make a pledge on behalf of the state.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports an amendment requiring verification of federal authority before spending money on a study as a fiscally responsible step.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
7 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
8 stored
Divided 3rd reading by Blake
Corrected, Adopted 3rd reading by Blake
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Blake
Failed 3rd reading by Petroff
Adopted Standing Committee by HAC
Failed 3rd reading by Hastert
Adopted Committee of the Whole by Bebout
Adopted Standing Committee by SAgriculture