Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2015Enacted

SF0145

Hospital uncompensated care.

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

A plain-English summary is not available yet.

Who it affects

Not clearly identified in the stored source.

Limits and unknowns

No additional limitations are listed.

Official record

Sources

Source attached

Official summary

Summary for LSO115 Bill No.: SF0145 Effective : 7/1/2015 LSO No.: 15LSO-0539 Enrolled Act No.: SEA 90 Chapter No.: 196 Prime Sponsor: Peterson Catch Title: Hospital uncompensated care. Subject: A ppropriates funds for hospitals’ uncompensated care. Summary/Major Elements: This act: Establishes the uncompensated charity care account and appropriates $2 Million from the general fund to the account, to be administered by the Department of Health to reimburse acute care hospitals for uncompensated charity care incurred between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015 ; Requires that the appropriation be divided between small and large hospitals, with 2/3's for small hospitals and 1/3 for large hospitals; Defines “ acute care hospitals ” and “ uncompensated charity care ” ; Requires rulemaking, which shall limit reimbursements to necessary support of the poor, require applicant hospitals to report uncompensated care by July 1, 2015 and prevent duplication of payments from other payors; A n additional $1 Million remain ing from an appropriation to the critical access/rural hospital endowment challenge program is reappropriated to the state auditor, for a grant program for hospital s having fewer than 25 beds and cash reserves of less than 1 00 days of operation . Includes a sunset date of June 30, 2016. The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill.

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 8, 10:20 PM

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that while the bill is a good start and necessary, it rewards hospitals with poor management rather than those managing well. Despite this concern about reverse incentives, they support voting yes as part of a compromise.

Public statementFloor statement at 44:00 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because they view it as an inadequate Band-Aid that fails to cure the underlying problem and creates expectations for future funding without a long-term solution.

Public statementFloor statement at 44:21 Watch the statement

Bill Landen

R · S27

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill as a temporary measure to stabilize funding and allow time to develop a more complete solution during the interim, noting that hospitals cannot refuse care for uncompensated trauma.

Public statementFloor statement at 46:56 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because they view it as a bailout for entities with management issues, arguing that throwing money at a large problem without guarantees or vision is not wise.

Public statementFloor statement at 50:27 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports voting yes because they view the funding as a life preserver for hospitals facing external forces and low cash reserves, rather than just a temporary Band-Aid.

Public statementFloor statement at 52:10 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill to prevent losing providers who serve as the state's safety net, acknowledging the system is broken due to federal decisions but emphasizing the need for immediate help.

Public statementFloor statement at 54:49 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker urges support for the bill to keep struggling hospitals alive for another year while long-term governance and taxation issues are studied.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:58:00 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that raising the bed threshold from 25 to 100 will better assist smaller community hospitals that lack resources despite having more than 25 beds, correcting a gap in the current reimbursement formula.

Public statementFloor statement at 40:43 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker states that while the bill provides some help to hospitals in need, it is merely a small temporary fix and does not cure the underlying problem.

Public statementFloor statement at 47:55 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because he believes it unfairly picks winners and losers among hospitals while negatively impacting the state budget, arguing that this is not the right vehicle to solve the issue.

Public statementFloor statement at 47:55 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because small hospitals in his district are desperate for funds and need immediate relief, even if it is only a temporary measure to buy time while finding a long-term solution.

Public statementFloor statement at 48:44 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because he believes it addresses a critical problem where hospitals might otherwise shut down or lose administrators, which is essential for maintaining rural healthcare services.

Public statementFloor statement at 51:25 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because he fears losing hospitals in rural areas, which would leave populations without timely access to critical emergency care like stroke treatment.

Public statementFloor statement at 54:00 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker urges caution on the vote because he believes there are unknowns regarding how hospitals calculate uncompensated care costs and whether current billing practices accurately reflect actual expenses.

Public statementFloor statement at 57:10 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill as a necessary safety net for hospitals facing severe cash reserve shortages, arguing that despite being imperfect, it is the best immediate action available to prevent hospital closures.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:02:05 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker states that as a businessman he understands the severity of bad debt for hospitals and believes providing some funding, even if imperfect, is necessary to acknowledge the issue.

Public statementFloor statement at 34:07 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

10 roll calls

H Adopted SF0145JC001: 42-15-3-0-02015-03-06 · House42 yes 15 no
S Adopted SF0145JC001: 20-7-3-0-02015-03-06 · Senate20 yes 7 no
S Concur:Failed 1-28-1-0-02015-03-05 · Senate1 yes 28 no
H 3rd Reading:Passed 50-9-1-0-02015-03-04 · House50 yes 9 no
Appropriations:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 5-2-0-0-02015-02-26 · House5 yes 2 no
Labor:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 9-0-0-0-02015-02-24 · House9 yes 0 no
S 3rd Reading:Passed 19-11-0-0-02015-02-11 · Senate19 yes 11 no
Amendment failed 11-19-0-0-02015-02-10 · Senate11 yes 19 no
Appropriations:Do Pass Failed 1-3-1-0-02015-02-05 · Senate1 yes 3 no
Labor:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 5-0-0-0-02015-02-04 · Senate5 yes 0 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. Assigned Chapter NumberLSO
  2. Governor Signed SEA No. 0090 Governor
  3. H Speaker Signed SEA No. 0090House
  4. S President Signed SEA No. 0090Senate
  5. Assigned Number SEA No. 0090LSO
  6. H Adopted SF0145JC001: 42-15-3-0-0House
  7. S Adopted SF0145JC001: 20-7-3-0-0Senate
  8. S Appointed JCC01 MembersSenate
  9. S Appointed JCC01 MembersSenate
  10. H Appointed JCC01 MembersHouse
  11. S Appointed JCC01 MembersSenate
  12. S Concur:Failed 1-28-1-0-0Senate
  13. S Received for ConcurrenceSenate
  14. H 3rd Reading:Passed 50-9-1-0-0House
  15. Amendment was withdrawn before voteHouse
  16. Amendment failedHouse
  17. Amendment AdoptedHouse
  18. Amendment AdoptedHouse
  19. Amendment failedHouse
  20. Amendment failedHouse

Changes

Amendments

20 stored

SF0145H2001

Corrected, Adopted 2nd reading by Harvey

SF0145H2002

Corrected, Adopted 2nd reading by Greear

SF0145H3001

Failed 3rd reading by Esquibel, K.

SF0145H3002

Failed 3rd reading by Throne

SF0145H3003

Adopted 3rd reading by Harshman

SF0145H3004

Adopted 3rd reading by Harshman

SF0145H3005

Divided 3rd reading by Halverson

SF0145H3005.01

Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Halverson

SF0145H3005.02

Corrected, Withdrawn 3rd reading by Halverson

SF0145HW001

Withdrawn Committee of the Whole by Harvey

SF0145HS001

Corrected, Adopted Standing Committee by House Labor

SF0145HS002

Corrected, Failed Standing Committee by HAC

SF0145S2001

Failed 2nd reading by Ross

SF0145S2002

Adopted 2nd reading by Scott

SF0145S3001

Failed 3rd reading by Burns

SF0145SW001

Failed Committee of the Whole by Ross

SF0145SW002

Adopted Committee of the Whole by Peterson

SF0145JC001

S Adopted, H Adopted Conference Committee

SF0145SS001

Adopted Standing Committee by SLabor

SF0145SS002

Withdrawn Standing Committee by SAppropriations