Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because he believes the compromise creates stronger, more predictable revenue projections and funding for SIPA compared to previous versions.
Spending policy amendments.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Summary for LSO115 Bill No.: SF0146 Effective : 3/10/2015 LSO No.: 15LSO-0387 Enrolled Act No.: SEA 91 Chapter No.: 195 Prime Sponsor: Nicholas, P. Catch Title: Spending policy amendments. Subject: State fund distributions and spending policy directives. Summary/Major Elements of this Act : Codifies and continues the Legislative Stabilization Reserve Account ( LSRA) which was created in 2005 session law. Codifies and continues the Strategic In vestments and Project Account ( SIPA) which was created in 2013 session law. Provides for the governor to make appropriation requests from SIPA for one-time purchases. Codifies and continues the School Foundation Program Reserve Account which was created in 2014 session law. Directs the State Treasurer, beginning July 1, 2016 for fiscal year 2017 and each year thereafter, to transfer unobligated funds from the Permane nt Wyoming Mineral Trust Fund (PWMTF ) Reserve Account to the General Fund to ensure that an amount equal to the spending policy amount specified in W.S. 9-4-719(d), reduced by the amount credited to the LSRA and the SIPA (2.5% of the 5 year average of the corpus of the PWMTF) is available for expenditure during each fiscal year. Amends the amount which tips from the PWMTF Reserve Account to the corpus of the PWMTF each fiscal year from amounts in the Reserve Account in excess of 75% of the spending policy amount in W.S. 9-4-719(d) to amounts in excess of 90% of the spending policy amount, beginning immediately. Directs earnings from the PWMTF, in an amount equal to the difference between 2.5% of the 5 year average of the corpus of the PWMTF and the spending policy amount specified in W.S. 9-4-719(d), (currently 5% of the average value of the corpus of the PWMTF for the previous 5 fiscal years) to the LSRA and the SIPA in equal amounts. Amends the amount which tips from the Common School Permanent Fund Reserve Account to the corpus of the Common School Account in the Permanent Land Fund each fiscal year from amounts in the Reserve Account in excess of 75% of the spending policy amount in W.S. 9-4-719(h) (currently 5% of the average value of the corpus of the Common School Account for the previous 5 fiscal years) to amounts in excess of 90% of the spending policy amount credited to the corpus of the Common School Account, beginning immediately. Directs the State Treasurer, beginning July 1, 2015 for fiscal year 2016 and each year thereafter, to transfer unobligated funds from the Common School Permanent Fund Reserve Account to the Common School Land Income Account to ensure that an amount equal to the 2.5% of the 5 year average of the corpus of the Common School Permanent Land Fund is available for expenditure during each fiscal year. Directs to the School Foundation Program Reserve Account, from federal mineral royalties above and below the $200 million cap, an amount equal to the next 2% above the first 3% of the 5 year average of the corpus of the Common School Account in the Permanent Land Fund and less than the spending policy amount for the common school account specified in W.S. 9-4-719(h). The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 7:08 AM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because he believes the compromise creates stronger, more predictable revenue projections and funding for SIPA compared to previous versions.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it eliminates unprofiled gains that require future extraction from accounts and establishes a consistent mechanism for one-time funding.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports concurrence because she views the bill as progress and a step forward on the issue, despite not being fully enthusiastic about it.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it establishes a predictable spending policy that preserves the permanent fund corpus and avoids political debates over capital gains, while ensuring funds are available for one-time projects.
S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that the bill has been poorly altered after leaving the Senate and specifically cites an issue regarding unobligated balances on page 2, line 19 as a reason to vote no.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to align spending policy amounts with revenue predictions and reserves for common schools.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it is grounded in separation of powers principles.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
7 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
8 stored
Failed 2nd reading by Zwonitzer, Dv.
Failed 3rd reading by Throne
Adopted Standing Committee by HAC
Adopted 2nd reading by Nicholas, P.
Failed 3rd reading by Meier
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Meier
Failed 3rd reading by Meier
S Adopted, H Adopted Conference Committee