Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2016Did Not Pass

HB0014

Asset forfeiture-3.

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

A plain-English summary is not available yet.

Who it affects

Not clearly identified in the stored source.

Limits and unknowns

No additional limitations are listed.

Official record

Sources

Source attached

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 7, 12:53 AM

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because it is substantially similar to a previously passed asset forfeiture measure, with specific changes allowing forfeiture in misdemeanor cases while capping cash amounts.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:10:43 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because he believes Senate File 46 is a better alternative that uses a higher evidence standard and requires immediate judicial hearings for seized assets.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:12:11 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill based on the principle that people's property should not be taken without a conviction, which this bill ensures.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:13:08 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

2 roll calls

Official activity

Bill history

  1. H Did Not Consider in CoWHouse
  2. H COWHouse
  3. H Placed on General FileHouse
  4. H01 - Judiciary:Recommend Do Pass 6-3-0-0-0House
  5. H Introduced and Referred to H01 - Judiciary 52-6-2-0-0House
  6. H Received for IntroductionHouse
  7. Bill Number AssignedLSO