Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it includes a data protection component that is key while allowing time for implementation.
Student data privacy and transparency.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Summary for LSO115 Bill No.: SF0014 Effective : 7/1/2016 LSO No.: 16LSO-0183 Enrolled Act No.: [EnrolledNumber_RO] Chapter No.: [Chapter Number_RO] Prime Sponsor: Joint Education Interim Committee Catch Title: Student data privacy and transparency. Subject: Student digital information accounts, state data security plan and school di strict policies on student data Summary/Major Elements: Th e act prohibits an officer or employee of a school district from: Requiring or requesting access to a student’s or prospective student’ s digital information account by username, password or other means of authentication that provides access; Requiring or requesting that a student or prospective student access his or her digital information account in the presence of the officer or employee; Compelling a student or prospective student to add the officer or employee to his or her list of cont acts or change the student’s privacy settings; Penalizing or threatening a student or prospective student for refusing to disclose information or take action with respect to the student’s digital information account; Requiring or requesting a student or prospective student waive or limit any protection granted under the act . Th e act does not prohibit an officer or employee of a school district from c onducting certain investigations or viewing information that is publicly available. Th e act provides a fine of $250 for a first violation and $1,000 for each subsequent violation. Th e act defines a digital information account as an electronic service or account used to communicate or store digital assets. Th e act also requires the State Superintendent of Public Instruction to: Include in the state data security plan standards and protocols to remove personally identifiable information and to conduct data collection and analysis without disclosing the identity of the student whose data is being collected and used; Establish and maintain guidelines on the collection, access, security and use of student data by school districts. Th e act further requires board s of trustees in each school district to adopt and enforce a policy regarding the collection, access, security and use of student data. NOTE: Final action on this bill was not taken at the time this summary was prepared. Should changes be made to the bill upon final passage, an updated summary will be prepared and placed upon the legislative website at http://legisweb.state.wy.us . A packet of updated summaries will be sent to all legislators after the time for any veto has expired (fifteen days after adjournment). The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill .
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 9:28 PM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it includes a data protection component that is key while allowing time for implementation.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports putting search and seizure limitations in statute because school districts must already comply with Fourth Amendment standards, making statutory clarification helpful rather than harmful.
R · H03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it establishes minimum standards for protecting sensitive student data like social security numbers and birth dates, ensuring local policies do not conflict with state requirements.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because it imposes fines on administrators who act in loco parentis to protect students, such as investigating potential abuse or safety threats by accessing digital information.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because school districts are concerned that it will hinder their ability to investigate cyberbullying and sexting without first consulting a lawyer.
R · S16
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because he believes schools must have access to electronic information to keep students safe from bullying and other dangerous situations.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it protects student privacy rights by requiring parents' involvement before administrators access private digital information, preventing overreach.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill due to concerns that young children lack rational minds and that teachers could face criminal penalties or fines for intervening in serious situations like mass shootings or sexual abuse.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because he believes school administrators should not be able to compel students to surrender their privacy without parental involvement, and it effectively addresses data privacy issues at the district level.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
7 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
6 stored
Failed 2nd reading by Harshman
Adopted 3rd reading by Stubson
Withdrawn 3rd reading by Pownall
Adopted 3rd reading by Brown
Adopted Standing Committee by HEducation
Adopted Standing Committee by SEducation