Why they voted this way
The speaker requested a favorable vote on the conference report because industry representatives supported changing specific language regarding what a person knew or should have known about patent infringement claims.
Patent trolling.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Summary for LSO115 Bill No.: SF0065 Effective : 7/1/2016 LSO No.: 16LSO-0279 Enrolled Act No.: SEA No. 0061 Chapter No.: 106 Prime Sponsor: Case Catch Title: Patent trolling. Subject: Prohibition of bad faith assertion of patent infringement Summ ary/Major Elements: This bill prohibits bad faith assertion s of patent infringement and specifies a number of factors for a court to consider in determining the existence of bad faith . T he factors include the contents of any demand letter that the person knew or should have known the patent was unenforceable, that the person does not own the right to enforce the patent , and any false representation that a complaint has been filed with a court. The bill also specifies factors that show the claim was not made in bad faith , including the person has made a subst antial investment in the patent and the person has previously enforced the patent . The bill creates a right of action for a person aggrieved by a bad faith assertion of patent infringement and provides for the recovery of damages and fees , including attorney’ s fees. E xemplary damages also are available in an amount equal to $50,000 or three (3) times the total of damages, costs and fees, whichever is greater. The bill specifies exemptions to the prohibition against bad faith assertion s of patent infringement. The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill .
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 12:39 AM
Why they voted this way
The speaker requested a favorable vote on the conference report because industry representatives supported changing specific language regarding what a person knew or should have known about patent infringement claims.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that changing the effective date to immediate could negatively impact innocent third parties who may not receive timely notice, creating unfair competitive advantages.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
8 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
5 stored
Divided 2nd reading by Zwonitzer, Dn.
Corrected, Adopted 2nd reading by Zwonitzer, Dn.
Corrected, Failed 2nd reading by Zwonitzer, Dn.
S Adopted, H Adopted Conference Committee
Adopted Standing Committee by SMinerals