Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2016Did Not Pass

SF0102

Federal funds distribution.

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

A plain-English summary is not available yet.

Who it affects

Not clearly identified in the stored source.

Limits and unknowns

No additional limitations are listed.

Official record

Sources

Source attached

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 7, 12:25 AM

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because requiring so many co-sponsors suggests something is fatally wrong with it.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:11:27 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill based on personal experience in their district where an experimental increase to a higher speed limit has proven to be an improvement for travel.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:11:49 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe changing speed limits via legislation rather than through departmental vetting is a significant and risky change that will cost money.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:12:33 Watch the statement

Bob Nicholas

R · H08

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because they believe the department is unnecessarily delaying speed limit increases and that most roads are safe for higher speeds except where proven otherwise.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:15:52 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because their personal driving experience on mountain passes and long stretches suggests that a higher speed limit is realistic for those areas.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:17:47 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker questions the wisdom of the bill because, despite personal benefit from fewer tickets, they are concerned about safety on roads where drivers cannot pull over to turn left or right.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:21:34 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker urges caution on the bill because raising the posted limit might cause average driving speeds to increase further, potentially creating safety risks.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:22:21 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because legislators lack knowledge of specific road safety features and should let the department responsible for constituent safety handle the decisions.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:23:10 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because it creates a federal funds holding account to ensure money is only spent through legislative appropriation, providing better tracking and control over federal monies.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:42:42 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

5 roll calls

H COW:Failed 10-47-3-0-02016-02-29 · House10 yes 47 no
H02 - Appropriations:Recommend Do Pass 7-0-0-0-02016-02-25 · House7 yes 0 no
S 3rd Reading:Passed 28-2-0-0-02016-02-23 · Senate28 yes 2 no
S02 - Appropriations:Recommend Do Pass 5-0-0-0-02016-02-15 · Senate5 yes 0 no
S Introduced and Referred to S02 - Appropriations 30-0-0-0-02016-02-12 · Senate30 yes 0 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. H COW:Failed 10-47-3-0-0House
  2. H Placed on General FileHouse
  3. H02 - Appropriations:Recommend Do Pass 7-0-0-0-0House
  4. H Introduced and Referred to H02 - AppropriationsHouse
  5. H Received for IntroductionHouse
  6. S 3rd Reading:Passed 28-2-0-0-0Senate
  7. S 2nd Reading:PassedSenate
  8. S 2nd Reading:Laid BackSenate
  9. S COW:PassedSenate
  10. S Placed on General FileSenate
  11. S02 - Appropriations:Recommend Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0Senate
  12. S Introduced and Referred to S02 - Appropriations 30-0-0-0-0Senate
  13. S Received for IntroductionSenate
  14. Bill Number AssignedLSO