Thomas D Crank

The lawmaker requested a no vote because they believe the committee made a mistake in drafting the bill, as the final text does not match their original intent.

The lawmaker supports the amendment due to confusion over who is responsible for implementing required mitigation measures mentioned in the bill.

The lawmaker supports the amendment to provide focus and resources for local gun clubs that generate significant economic activity through visitor spending.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because recent economic hardships suggest a need for additional department funding to help citizens.

The lawmaker believes the bill requires more discussion because it involves complex code outside their expertise, and they are concerned about potential dangers from aggregating code created in remote locations.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because he believes it is unfair to deny funding to colleges that can meet a matching requirement just because other colleges might not be able to.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because providing notice at the end of a project gives suppliers time to claim payment if issues arise, similar to lien laws.

The sponsor reiterates that prosecutors stated the law was too ambiguous, necessitating a tightening of the statute to enable prosecution.