Richard Tass

The lawmaker argues it is unfair for the state to retain fees paid for unused brand registration periods when a brand is transferred, as the new owner must pay again. He states he does not want to donate more money than necessary.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because a $5,000 threshold is too low for farm equipment transactions between neighbors. Selling items like tractors or balers often exceeds this amount, potentially putting farmers in violation of tax laws if they lack proper registration.

The lawmaker supports the bill because the opt-in provision allows county commissioners, who are closer to constituents, to decide whether to allow these facilities.

The lawmaker supports the bill because committee work improved his initial concerns, and he believes the amendment would remove necessary protections for property rights.