Reuben Tarver

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe it could negatively impact a landowner's ability to expand their own property for residential use or water wells.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes grants are necessary to help small companies with shovel-ready projects succeed immediately.

The lawmaker recommends passing the amendment because restaffing is difficult and keeping current staff is essential if there is any intention to restructure or continue the agency.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because delaying action on highway funding will not make the problem go away or get cheaper, and this is a fantastic idea to address it.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe standards can be tightened and performance demanded constructively without harming the state or small businesses.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because industry pays for it and maintaining state primacy is necessary.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because additional cuts would compromise community safety by reducing law enforcement coverage in large counties.

The lawmaker explains that the bill provides necessary financial assistance for expensive tertiary oil recovery operations, which helps prevent legacy fields from being abandoned and avoids future state costs associated with plugging wells.

The lawmaker supports the bill because it fast-tracks a vetted process to increase revenue and sell more Wyoming products.