Bill Allemand

The lawmaker supports overriding the veto to reclassify a director position and adjust pay starting at the vacancy, which he argues will resolve organizational problems caused by previous overpayment.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because he fears that grants could result in lost investments if a future administration changes policies, citing the Keystone pipeline example.

The lawmaker leans toward prohibiting the substance because he believes regulating it at lower concentrations will fail to control street versions, yet he is conflicted about removing a product that helps people with chronic pain.

The lawmaker opposes Amendment One because he believes the silo ensures that appropriated salary increases for teachers cannot be diverted to other uses.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because adding another $131 million annual cost to a state already facing a projected fiscal cliff and school funding deficit is fiscally irresponsible.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes college administrators and faculty are better positioned to determine their own needs than an external study funded by this appropriation.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because, despite supporting the agency's mission, they believe it is not the right time to grow government by adding clerical support.

The lawmaker plans to support the amendment despite believing it may be illegal, because they want to avoid costly lawsuits and believe in turning the acreage into a state park.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment to prevent funding what he views as unnecessary expenditures like statues and ski lodges, while noting that special services can be addressed separately.

The lawmaker supports the bill to fulfill the specific request of constituents in House District 58 who want a vote on nuclear waste storage.