Paul Hoeft

The lawmaker supports the resolution due to concerns over national debt and unchecked spending, believing Article V has sufficient safeguards against a runaway convention.

The lawmaker supports the bill because they believe a state guard can assist local law enforcement during localized catastrophes and address national security concerns regarding tourists.

The lawmaker supports the bill because it offers patients freedom from expensive surgeries and significant financial burdens associated with traditional medical procedures.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because he believes the facility will benefit youth by providing a centralized location for state competitions and keeping young people engaged in productive activities.

The lawmaker reiterates their position to build one strong team first before expanding, emphasizing caution in the process.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because their constituents overwhelmingly back the legislation, and they view it as a matter of who pays for advocacy rather than restricting rights.

The lawmaker supports the bill because pregnancy centers face unique threats compared to other nonprofits, and the legislation provides dignity and corrects false information about their viability.

The lawmaker voted against the bill due to concerns about Medicaid expansion, noting that such programs often grow beyond their original scope and become difficult to control.

The lawmaker argues the bill is necessary because taxpayers seek relief from being lobbied against by their own government officials who use public funds.

The lawmaker argues the bill strengthens chain of custody by limiting ballot delivery to voters, immediate family, or authorized caregivers with strict limits and affidavits. They state this prevents third-party tampering, coercion, and abuse while preserving mail options.