Clifford M Jennings

The speaker supports the amendment based on past experience showing that lower prices do not prevent whitetail populations from growing out of control.

The lawmaker supports the amendment again, emphasizing that it protects people from being drawn into the system without due process.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it clarifies that parents can seek damages for violations of their fundamental rights, which is necessary given the state's deep pockets.

The lawmaker supports removing pre-kindergarten because the state currently does not support such programs in regular public schools, making it difficult to expand.

The lawmaker supports the amendment as a short-term measure to provide immediate financial relief and show constituents that the legislature is addressing their concerns.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because schools were not listening to parents, and adding a cause of action provides necessary clarity and actual relief for families.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it provides immediate, across-the-board relief while ensuring schools are made whole without requiring cuts.

The lawmaker supports the amendment unless provided with a specific example of why it should be opposed, indicating their vote depends on hearing such an argument.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe its intent is more anti-transpirant than addressing frivolous filings.

The lawmaker believes the current parental rights statute is already clear and sufficient, arguing that this bill creates unnecessary judicial problems rather than solving issues.