Trey Sherwood

The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure individuals who work hard on Wyoming soil have a fair opportunity to obtain hunting tags.

The lawmaker opposes the appropriation because it opens the door to future obligations without clarity on how equipment needs will be met. They argue the amount is too low for equipping a state guard.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it clarifies health insurance coverage for school employees who work fewer than 30 hours, ensuring they can qualify for benefits.

The lawmaker supports the amendment as a necessary adjustment to cover costs for EMS providers, ensuring they remain ready to serve seniors and maternal health needs.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it was funded in a way that allows for compromise and provides good pathways forward.

The lawmaker supports the amendment to shift existing funds from waitlist funding to provider rates so that staff can be recruited and retained.

The lawmaker urges colleagues to vote yes because major maintenance is the top priority on the state building commission's list and these projects were previously approved.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because he believes it is a wise investment to finish what was started, noting that the current request contains no general fund money and matches previous legislative approvals.

The lawmaker supports the amendment as one piece of solving a complex issue, arguing against using complexity to justify inaction on ensuring more young people remain in communities.

The lawmaker urges caution because the bill would compound existing deficits in school foundation program funding and reduce revenue for counties.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because having plates on both sides of a vehicle helps law enforcement officers identify situations before exiting their vehicles during traffic stops.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because merchant category codes provide businesses with necessary data on market saturation and community needs to make informed investment decisions.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because it threatens libraries as community centers and contradicts constituent views that parents, not legislators, should decide what children read.