Ocean Andrew

The lawmaker supports concurrence because they believe it will improve the situation for electric vehicle drivers in their state.

The lawmaker supports concurrence because they believe it will improve the situation for electric vehicle drivers in the state.

The speaker supports the bill because it ensures individuals join organizations on their own, removing potential coercion from employers handling the process.

The speaker argues that the bill recycles money from extractive industries back into the economy and ecology by funding infrastructure like pipelines to increase sales and revenue. They state they will vote no on an amendment because of this investment rationale.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe all classroom resources should go directly to classrooms for smaller class sizes and better teachers rather than allowing any leakage.

The lawmaker supports the amendment as a technical correction necessary for the position in the bill to have actual work to do, since the statute it administers was recently repealed and replaced.

The lawmaker supports the bill because it increases incentives for researchers to stay at the university by allowing them to keep a larger share of profits and ownership from their ideas. The speaker also notes that additional stipends will help attract top research talent.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe it is bad for law enforcement and supports maintaining law and order.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe funding should reflect actual attendance, arguing it is illogical to fund a school for more than the percentage of time students are present.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because committee evidence showed a safe increase amount, but they are concerned about increasing it further without current data.

The lawmaker states they drafted an amendment to clarify misunderstandings about the bill's intent, specifically noting that firefighters were always intended to be exempt because they are the only group with a statutory right to collectively organize and bargain.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe it is better addressed through a separate Senate file that will be considered later, rather than in this budget bill.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because he believes ignoring these support programs contradicts a pro-life stance when mothers choose to raise children with serious problems.

The lawmaker supports the measure because workers fear retaliation or job loss if their employers know whether they are voluntarily paying union dues, making the current system not truly voluntary.

The speaker supports the amendment to ensure sufficient funds are available for the Steamboat Legacy Scholarship program if an injunction is lifted, preventing a funding shortfall before the next budget cycle.

The lawmaker supports moving the bill because it applies to topics discussed frequently by their committee and the sponsor is already on that committee.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe the committee version was ready after multiple in-person meetings and should be continued instead.

The lawmaker supports the bill because personal experience showed that EV charging stations are being removed due to new taxes, making travel with electric vehicles more difficult.

The lawmaker supports the bill because it creates a limited pilot program for high-performing students to use scholarship funds at private institutions, with built-in oversight and an evaluation period.