Daniel Singh

The lawmaker states that consistent pricing is essential for consumer protection, comparing it to standards expected in other industries where variable pricing would not be allowed.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe it improves the bill.

The lawmaker supports the amendment, arguing that requiring licenses for simple card games is excessive and that passing this would improve the bill.

The lawmaker supports the bill because they recognize a problem exists regarding gaming safety and believe a committee is needed to address it, though they have questions about accountability measures.

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe it weakens the bill's effectiveness.

The speaker supports concurring with Senate amendments because they do not harm the bill and help clarify it into a well-enforced law for protecting children.

The lawmaker supports concurrence because the amendments do not harm the bill and help clean it up to ensure effective enforcement for child protection.

The lawmaker supports the bill because he believes it is necessary to protect citizens from foreign governments imposing fines or criminal consequences for their online speech and communication.

The lawmaker opposes funding because they believe public money competing with private industry is not the role of government.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it provides necessary resources for a voluntary state program that generates income and ultimately repays funds to the school foundation account.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it ensures full funding for highway patrol, dispatchers, port of entry staff, and snowplow drivers to maintain public safety.

The lawmaker supports changing the bill's home to a different committee so they can have further conversation with the person responsible for sponsoring it.

The lawmaker supports the bill because they believe the inclusion of the 340B program is a critical component that strengthens consumer protection standards in Wyoming.

The lawmaker supports the bill because it clarifies legal definitions for digital assets and tokens, which protects property rights by reducing uncertainty and litigation confusion.

The lawmaker opposes the bill by citing Article I, Section 7 of the constitution to argue against arbitrary power over property rights in a republic.

The lawmaker requests support to introduce a Wyoming solution that leads on international free speech issues if members care about freedom of expression.

The lawmaker expresses concern that the bill's undefined human consumption clause could negatively impact cell culture technology used in medicine testing and cosmetics, rather than just food.

The lawmaker states that codifying de novo review would be a net benefit for Wyoming.