Why they voted this way
The speaker argues that the conference committee report improved upon the original House position and encourages members to vote in favor.
Spending policy amendments-2.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Bill Summary Bill No.: HB0055 Effective : 7/1/2017 LSO No.: 17LSO-0283 Enrolled Act No.: HEA No. 0122 Chapter No.: 206 Prime Sponsor: Select Committee on Capital Financing & Investments Catch Title: Spending policy amendments-2. Subject: Amends the spending policy rates for certain funds and accounts. Summary/Major Elements: Existing law specifies the fund balance when funds shall be transferred (or “tipped”) annually from the permanent Wyoming mineral trust fund reserve account, the common school perma nent fund reserve account and the excellence in higher education endowment reserve account back into the corpus of their respective permanent fund. For purposes of the permanent Wyoming mineral trust fund reserve account, funds in the account in excess of 90% of the specified annual spending policy amount shall be credited to the permanent Wyoming mineral trust fund (PWMTF). This act increases that percentage to 150%; For purposes of the common school permanent fund reserve account, funds in excess of 90% of the spending policy amount shall be credited to the common school account within the permanent land fund (CSPLF). This act increases that percentage to 150%; For purposes of the excellence in higher education endowment reserve account, funds in excess of 75% of the specified annual spending policy amount shall be credited to the excellence in higher education endowment fund. This act increases that percentage to 150%. Existing law establishes the annual spending policy amounts for the PWMTF and the CSPLF . Earning s in excess of the specified spending policy amount from the corpus of the se permanent funds are annual ly deposited to the ir respective reserve account. This act provides that the spending policies for both the PWMTF and the CSPLF are : For fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020, an amount equal to 5% of the previous 5 year average market value of the respective fund; For fiscal year 2021, an amount equal to 4.75% of the previous 5 year average market value of the respective fund; For fiscal year 2022 and each fiscal year thereafter, an amount equal to 4.5% of the previous 5 year average market value of the respective fund. Existing law establishes the annual spending policy amount for the excellence in higher education endowment. This act provides that the amount is: For fiscal year 2018, an amount equal to 5% of the previous 5 year average market value of the fund; For fiscal year 2019 and each fiscal year thereafter, an amount equal to 4.75% of the previous 5 year average market value of the respective fund. Existing law provides for the transfer of funds from the common school permanent fund reserve account to the common school account within the permanent land income fund as necessary to ensure that an amount equal to 2.5% of the previous 5 year average market value of the account is available for expenditure annually. This act increases the amount of the maximum transfer, to the extent funds are available in the reserve account, to the specified annual spending policy amount which shall be available for expenditure annually. The act modifies restrictions and provisions on shortfalls regarding earnings distributed to institutions from investments of monies in the excellence in higher education endowment fund. The act also repeals the appropriation of funds to the school foundation program reserve account when earnings from the CSPLF exceed 3% of the previous 5 year average market value of the CSPLF . Comments: Creates/amends a major program relating to revenue distribution . The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill .
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 9:50 PM
Why they voted this way
The speaker argues that the conference committee report improved upon the original House position and encourages members to vote in favor.
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the agreement because it balances growing the fund corpus while allowing for budget balancing, describing the outcome as just right.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes concurring with the report because it does not match the five-part solution originally sent by the House to address the education deficit.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill to avoid a heavier financial hit during recalibration and prefers a gradual reduction over an immediate free fall.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill as another necessary step in an ongoing process to solve education funding issues, acknowledging it is not a complete solution.
S03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a step toward moving asset allocation decisions from legislative intent to professional investment planners.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker expresses confusion about why additional flexibility for alternative investments is needed alongside the equity allocation.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
7 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
8 stored
H Adopted, S Adopted Conference Committee
Adopted Standing Committee by HAppropriations
Adopted 2nd reading by Perkins
Corrected, Adopted 2nd reading by Meier
Adopted 3rd reading by Perkins
Adopted Committee of the Whole by Burns
Failed Committee of the Whole by Meier
Adopted Standing Committee by SAppropriations