Robert A Clausen

The lawmaker supports the amendment to set aside matching funds for federal infrastructure projects, arguing that missing out on potential federal dollars is a greater risk than losing interest income.

The lawmaker opposes concurrence because he views the amendment as an unnecessary addition that was deemed inappropriate by the committee.

The lawmaker opposes passing this specific bill because they believe it does not adequately guard against future threats and encourages waiting for a better version next year.

The lawmaker supports the bill to clarify state ownership of water and ensure proper management while protecting prior appropriation rights.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because spending these federal dollars contributes to inflation that negatively affects constituents at gas pumps and grocery stores.

The lawmaker urges a no vote because the bill sets an actual salary number rather than a cap and represents a raise that is not comparable to increases given to other state employees in the budget.

The lawmaker supports the bill because it serves as a simple clarification of a specific point in state statute regarding contested cases.

The speaker urges a no vote on the amendment because removing the funds will eliminate necessary resources for cyber security, software maintenance, and hardware issues.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because Wyoming needs matching funds to apply for federal infrastructure projects, including water storage and road crossings.

The lawmaker states the bill simply places private property on a value scale with other private property, arguing it would not hurt anyone even if federal royalties increased.

The lawmaker supports defeating the amendment to stay out of deviation because protecting Native American populations and cultural communities is worth exceeding population limits.

The lawmaker urges voting no because he believes the bill covers all vaccine mandates, upends established public health doctrine, is anti-business by stripping employers of authority to set conditions, and imposes an arbitrary five-year wait period for school mandates.

The speaker supports the bill because inflation over decades makes an increase to the revenue threshold necessary.