Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a common-sense measure ensuring that required disclosures are included in writing within the repair contract.
Exterior residential storm damage repair contracts.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Bill Summary Bill No.: SF0127 Effective : 7/1/2017 LSO No.: 17LSO-0601 Enrolled Act No.: SEA No. 0085 Chapter No.: 196 Prime Sponsor: Pappas Catch Title: Exterior residential storm damage repair contracts. Subject: Creating new c onsumer protection requirements for exterior residential storm damage repair contracts. Summary/Major Elements: The bill requires contractors who provide exterior storm damage repair services to disclose specified information to consumers when advertising or soliciting their services, such as the contractor's business name and whether it is insur ed and licen sed . The bill prohibits contractors from engaging in certain types of conduct while soliciting services to consumers. The bill provides disclosure requirements for exterior storm damage repair proposals and contracts. The contractor must state in writing all repairs which are included and excluded in the proposal and provide a description of any emergency repairs already completed. The bill provides that a consumer may canc el an exterior storm damage repair contract for any reason within three days of entering into the contract . Every contract must include notice of the consumer 's right to cancel the contract. The bill provides that the private remed y provisions of the Wyoming Consumer Protection Act apply to any person who violates the requirements for exterior residential storm damage repair services The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill .
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 12:41 AM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a common-sense measure ensuring that required disclosures are included in writing within the repair contract.
R · H08
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment regarding location details on cancellation notices as a necessary consumer protection measure against bad actors, despite concerns about regulatory overreach.
H31
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges a no vote because he believes this amendment completely overhauls the changes made during second reading, undoing previous work on the bill.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues for supporting the amendment because it provides a three-day cancellation period that protects consumers from liability if an insurance company disputes damage after a contract is signed.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes it reintroduces insurance company involvement into contracts, which contradicts his goal of protecting consumers from high-pressure sales.
R · H09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the division because he believes consumers lack viable recourse options if they are stuck paying for work an insurance company denies, as suing a large corporation is difficult and expensive.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
5 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
11 stored
Adopted 2nd reading by Greear
Adopted 3rd reading by Zwonitzer
Adopted 3rd reading by Zwonitzer
Failed 3rd reading by Zwonitzer
Divided 3rd reading by Zwonitzer
Corrected, Adopted 3rd reading by Zwonitzer
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Zwonitzer
Adopted Standing Committee by HMinerals
Adopted 2nd reading by Scott
Adopted 3rd reading by Pappas
Adopted Standing Committee by SMinerals