Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2021Enacted

HB0236

Stopping Banks from Refusing to Work with Gun Businesses

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

This law stops banks and other financial companies from refusing to work with businesses that sell guns, gun parts, or ammo unless there's a good reason like money issues or following rules.

What it does

  • Banks can't refuse to do business with gun-related companies just because they deal in firearms, accessories, or ammunition.
  • If a bank breaks this rule, people who are hurt by it can sue the bank and get their lawyer fees paid for if they win.
  • The state's top law officer (Attorney General) can also take action against banks that break this rule and ask the governor to stop working with them.

Who it affects

  • Financial institutions like banks, payment processors, and national banking associations
  • Gun-related businesses including manufacturers, retailers, distributors, shooting ranges, and trade associations

Limits and unknowns

  • The law does not apply if the bank has a written policy against discrimination towards firearm entities.
  • Banks can still refuse to work with gun-related businesses for business reasons or as required by regulators.

Plain language

Terms to know

Discriminate
To refuse to do business with someone or end an existing relationship without a good reason.
Financial institution
A bank, payment processor, or national banking association that handles money and financial transactions.

Official record

Sources

Validated

Official summary

Bill Summary - 21LSO-0617 Bill No.: HB0236 Effective: 7/1/2021 12:00:00 AM LSO No.: 21LSO-0617 Enrolled Act No.: HEA No. 0087 Chapter No.: 142 Prime Sponsor: Washut Catch Title: Firearms transactions-financial discrimination. Subject: Prohibiting financial institutions from discriminating against firearms businesses. Summary/Major Elements: This act prohibits financial institutions from discriminating against firearms businesses because the business supports or is engaged in the lawful commerce of firearms, firearm accessories or ammunition products. In the context of this act, "discriminate" means to: Refuse to engage in the trade of any goods or services; Refrain from continuing an existing business relationship; Terminate an existing business relationship; Otherwise unlawfully discriminate against a person. The act specifies situations in which a financial institution may choose not to provide services to a firearm business, such as for a business or financial reason, as a regulatory requirement, or when a financial institution has a written policy against discrimination against firearms businesses. The act creates a civil action and specifies civil remedies, including several types of allowable damage awards, injunctive relief and attorney's fees. The act specifies a statute of limitations of two (2) years on the civil actions it allows. This act authorizes the Wyoming Attorney General to bring an action to request a declaratory judgment, an injunction or a civil penalty not to exceed twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per violation. The Attorney General also shall also inform the Governor and request that the state terminate any business relationship with any financial institution found to have violated this act. The remedies and actions available or required under this act are not applicable if a financial institution has a written policy prohibiting the institution from discriminating against firearm entities. The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill.

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 5, 9:44 PM

Landon Brown

R · H09

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because an amendment allows private organizations to override statutory restrictions by simply stating a non-discrimination policy, which they believe makes the law unenforceable.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:21:56 Watch the statement

Lloyd Larsen

R · H54

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because they believe it is inappropriate for legislation to restrict how private financial institutions choose their business partners, and the amendment addresses this concern.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:24:29 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because it targets blanket discrimination against an entire industry, while allowing exemptions for institutions that already have non-discrimination policies.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:26:43 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because they believe it achieves necessary justice and is enforceable, noting that bankers helped draft the amendment.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:28:07 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because they believe it helps diversify the state's economy and encourages industry growth, viewing the amendment as a good faith improvement.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:29:07 Watch the statement

Cale Case

R · S25

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because it protects freedom to invest in legal businesses and aligns with Wyoming's pro-business environment, noting that banks are already competing for these companies.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:22:01 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill as a countermeasure against cancel culture using financial institutions to target legal firearm businesses and their customers.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:26:16 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

5 roll calls

H Concur:Passed 44-13-3-0-02021-04-06 · House44 yes 13 no
S 3rd Reading:Passed 23-6-1-0-02021-04-02 · Senate23 yes 6 no
S01 - Judiciary:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 5-0-0-0-02021-03-31 · Senate5 yes 0 no
H 3rd Reading:Passed 49-11-0-0-02021-03-22 · House49 yes 11 no
H01 - Judiciary:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 7-2-0-0-02021-03-10 · House7 yes 2 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. Assigned Chapter Number 142LSO
  2. Governor Signed HEA No. 0087 Governor
  3. S President Signed HEA No. 0087Senate
  4. H Speaker Signed HEA No. 0087House
  5. Assigned Number HEA No. 0087LSO
  6. H Concur:Passed 44-13-3-0-0House
  7. H Received for ConcurrenceHouse
  8. S 3rd Reading:Passed 23-6-1-0-0Senate
  9. S 2nd Reading:PassedSenate
  10. S COW:PassedSenate
  11. S Placed on General FileSenate
  12. S01 - Judiciary:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0Senate
  13. S Introduced and Referred to S01 - JudiciarySenate
  14. S Received for IntroductionSenate
  15. H 3rd Reading:Passed 49-11-0-0-0House
  16. H 2nd Reading:PassedHouse
  17. H COW:PassedHouse
  18. H Placed on General FileHouse
  19. H01 - Judiciary:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 7-2-0-0-0House
  20. H Introduced and Referred to H01 - JudiciaryHouse

Changes

Amendments

5 stored

HB0236H2001

The amendment adds a new section to the bill that prohibits financial institutions from discriminating against any entity based on certain protected characteristics, such as race or religion.

HB0236HS001

The amendment increases the minimum amount of damages a successful plaintiff can receive from $10,000 to $20,000 in civil actions against financial institutions that discriminate against firearms businesses.

HB0236S2001

The amendment changes the bill to allow financial institutions with specific policies against discrimination towards firearms businesses to be exempt from certain provisions.

HB0236S2002

The amendment changes the bill's focus from prohibiting financial discrimination against firearms businesses to also including protections for those involved in or advocating for the forcible housing of military personnel.

HB0236SS001

The amendment changes the definition of 'financial institution' and who can regulate them in a bill about banks not discriminating against firearm businesses.