MARTINEZ

The lawmaker supports the bill because they believe it helps diversify the state's economy and encourages industry growth, viewing the amendment as a good faith improvement.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because he believes murder and manslaughter are the subject matter, making the death penalty discussion relevant to that same subject.

The speaker opposes the bill as profligate and unsustainable, arguing that spending on these projects prevents filling deficits or funding needed services.

The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe it supports a utilitarian method that commodifies life and makes people in faith communities feel less than.

The speaker supports the bill because voter suppression in their district is real but occurs on the reverse side of party lines.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe current economic conditions require focusing on immediate needs rather than long-term projects, especially when funds intended for specific relief purposes might be diverted.

The lawmaker supports increasing the mill levy because no increase has occurred in 47 years, making this adjustment warranted.