Mark H Baker
H60
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it shifts a function from counties to the state without using county general funds for startup costs.
Monthly ad valorem tax changes for mineral production
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Bill Summary - 21LSO-0305 Bill No.: SF0060 Effective: Immediately LSO No.: 21LSO-0305 Enrolled Act No.: SEA No. 0009 Chapter No.: 28 Prime Sponsor: Joint Revenue Interim Committee Catch Title: Monthly ad valorem tax revisions-2. Subject: Monthly payment of ad valorem taxes on mineral production. Summary/Major Elements: This bill provides for the monthly payment of ad valorem taxes on mineral production beginning January 1, 2022. The bill specifies that fifty percent (50%) of production from calendar year 2020 and all of production from calendar year 2021 will be paid at eight percent (8%) per year beginning December 1, 2023 until the total outstanding amount is repaid. The bill appropriates funds for loans to counties to address shortfalls caused by the transition to monthly payments. The bill appropriates funds from the school foundation program account to address decreased local revenues caused by the transition to monthly payments and makes revisions to the annual computation of school district revenues to account for the payment of monthly ad valorem taxes. The bill also appropriates funds to the Department of Revenue to administer the collection of ad valorem tax by the Department. The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 6:38 AM
H60
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it shifts a function from counties to the state without using county general funds for startup costs.
R · H46
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports an amendment to adjust fees by rounding them to multiples of $25 so they match original 2000 fees adjusted for inflation.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes counties have already paid for similar functions through lawsuits and other means, making this additional charge unfair to them.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports moving the function to the state to improve efficiency, accuracy, and early detection of tax shortfalls by aligning it with severance taxes.
H02
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes it would unfairly penalize smaller, poorer counties with low property values that are already struggling financially.
R · H40
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because industry requested state implementation due to complexity, and the state is already equipped to handle these monthly reports.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes counties are fulfilling their responsibilities and that charging them would be detrimental given the state's potential financial gain from the bill.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it is fair for counties to contribute a small portion since they are losing the workload and benefiting from the shift.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues for the amendment as a compromise to ensure counties help pay for the system costs since the state is taking over their workload and duties.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that while the bill costs $500,000 and is difficult to pass, it corrects a duty previously assigned to counties which should now be shared with the state.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it provides a necessary transition period for local governments and schools to manage cash flow issues caused by changes in mineral tax payments.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker expresses concern about how the bill affects county treasurers and whether local governments will be financially whole after implementation.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
7 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
5 stored
The amendment requires counties to pay for their share of implementing monthly ad valorem tax collection and allows the state to withhold a county's tax revenue if they do not make these payments.
The amendment changes specific monetary amounts in the bill from $40 million to $16,726,000 and from $1 to $274,000.
The amendment modifies the bill to specify how mineral production ad valorem taxes are collected and distributed monthly by county treasurers.
The amendment clarifies how ad valorem taxes on mineral production are distributed and modifies the tax payment schedule for calendar years 2020 and 2021.
The amendment changes how ad valorem taxes are paid for mineral production from calendar years 2020 and 2021, increases the loan amount available to counties, and adds a small appropriation for implementing the act.