Allen Slagle

The lawmaker urges a no vote because the amendment restricts things that the bill itself says it will do, creating a conflict between the two.

The speaker urges an affirmative vote because they believe the joint resolution provides a better way for citizens to address resident aliens than the current constitution.

The lawmaker urges an I vote because if there was time to work the bill, there should have also been time to hear from constituents.

The lawmaker states a no vote based on significant concerns regarding the bill's justifiability, equity, stability, and transparency.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because maintaining this infrastructure is a role government must fulfill when individuals cannot do it alone.

The lawmaker supports deleting funding because he believes keeping the capital open on weekends is not a wise use of money given the low number of visitors.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe funding at 90% of market rate will be more than sufficient given that it applies to the current cycle rather than older data.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it provides tax relief for people using money already on hand.

The lawmaker supports the amendment because aging infrastructure in his region requires additional funding options that this measure would provide.

The lawmaker argues that the bill corrects a 'parody tax' by ensuring new wind companies are taxed rather than receiving breaks, while protecting existing energy producers through grandfathering.

The lawmaker explains that the bill exempts insurance damage payments from sales and use tax to prevent taxpayers from being taxed twice on a vehicle payment, similar to how trade-ins are treated.