Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because an amendment clarifies what the legislation does, which helps protect children.
Children Gender Change Prohibition
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Bill Summary - 24LSO-0042 Bill No.: SF0099 Effective: Multiple Dates LSO No.: 24LSO-0042 Enrolled Act No.: SEA No. 0052 Chapter No.: 113 Prime Sponsor: Bouchard Catch Title: Children gender change prohibition. Has Report: No Subject: Prohibiting physicians from performing procedures related to gender transitioning and gender reassignment. Summary/Major Elements: This act provides that no physician or health care provider shall perform various medical procedures related to transitioning a child's biological sex or affirming the child's perception of the child's sex if different from the child's biological sex. The procedures prohibited include: Specified surgeries that sterilize the child. Mastectomies. The provision or dispensing of prescription drugs that cause puberty suppression or that delay normal puberty. Supraphysiologic doses of testosterone to females. Supraphysiologic doses of estrogen to males. Procedures that remove any otherwise healthy or nondiseased body part or tissue. The prohibition does not apply to procedures to which the child's parent consents and are for a child born with a medically verifiable genetic disorder of sex development or for a child with medically verifiable central precocious puberty. Nothing in this act is to be construed to prohibit a minor from receiving mental health treatment, so long as the treatment does not include any of the prohibited procedures. The act provides that a violation of this act may be grounds for discipline for physicians, pharmacists and nurses. The act requires the Department of Health, the State Board of Medicine and the State Board of Pharmacy to promulgate rules to implement the act. Comments: The act has a split effective date. The act is effective July 1, 2024, except for provisions authorizing rulemaking, which are effective immediately. The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 5, 10:23 PM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because an amendment clarifies what the legislation does, which helps protect children.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure that minors who have received care in other states can still receive necessary prescriptions for side effects or unrelated conditions like depression.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe it negates the purpose of the bill by including gender dysphoria in the diagnostic manual referenced.
R · H09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe it ensures that children can still receive necessary psychiatric and psychological evaluations, which aligns with their intent for the bill.
H55
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe it makes the bill more comprehensive by explicitly acknowledging and supporting mental health treatment for children.
R · H61
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to clarify that the bill does not stop access to psychological or psychiatric treatment, ensuring children receive necessary care.
R · H34
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe mental health issues are separate from this bill, which is specifically about prohibiting physical adjustments and surgeries.
R · H36
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they fear the undefined term 'psychiatric treatment' could create a loophole allowing puberty blockers to be prescribed.
R · H54
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe there is a valid concern that without it, mental health providers might hesitate to treat patients due to ambiguous definitions in the bill.
R · H06
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe it creates loopholes that could expose children to lifelong side effects from pharmaceutical treatments.
R · H01
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment to ensure children have every opportunity to grow up without what they perceive as unnecessary restrictions or loopholes in mental health provisions.
H02
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges a no vote because the amendment restricts things that the bill itself says it will do, creating a conflict between the two.
R · H17
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they view the issue as mental health related, believing providers need this ability to do their job without creating a loophole.
H33
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it uses language implying that every young person dealing with gender dysphoria has a mental disorder needing professional help.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a clarifying measure to ensure citizens understand that mental health treatment is not prohibited by the bill.
H55
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports adding 'purposefully' because opponents claim sterilization cannot happen by accident, and if that is true, the word causes no harm.
R · H04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes adding 'purposefully' because it creates an exception that could allow doctors to claim they erroneously believed drugs did not sterilize, thereby swallowing the rule.
R · H36
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports keeping the word 'purposefully' in the bill, arguing that it protects against lawsuits by acknowledging that accidents can happen.
R · H50
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that including language about psychological care is a proportionate and fair way to acknowledge the difficulties faced by teenagers while maintaining the prohibition on medical procedures.
D · H13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes defining gender dysphoria as a medical condition in the bill, arguing that it is outside the legislature's role to be prescriptive about diagnoses and potentially steers doctors in a specific direction.
R · H40
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that the definition of healthcare should be saving lives rather than mutilating people, which is why they support an immediate vote on the bill.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because it inserts state government between parents, children, and healthcare providers, contradicting values of individual freedom and parental choice.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because healthcare professionals have indicated that state government should not be involved in these decisions, viewing it as an intrusive expansion of authority.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because minors lack the maturity and understanding to make such profound life choices, viewing external pressure on children as child abuse.
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill by citing natural variability in human development and arguing that restricting healthcare decisions violates the state's Healthcare Freedom Amendment.
R · S18
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill by arguing that history will view these medical interventions as a mistake, urging common sense to stop them.
R · S05
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill based on testimony from a young woman who suffered permanent physical consequences from experimental treatments, describing them as mutilation.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill to protect very young children who cannot make decisions, arguing they are being subjected to harmful chemicals and hormones.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
8 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
8 stored
The amendment adds an exception for non-surgical medically necessary treatments related to gender transitioning when such decisions are made with parental consent.
The amendment adds a new section to the bill that allows psychological or psychiatric treatment for any diagnosis listed in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual.
The amendment proposes to remove a specific line from the bill SF0099, which is related to public health and safety.
The amendment removes an existing provision and adds new language that allows minors to receive developmentally appropriate psychotherapy.
The amendment adds a new provision allowing minors to receive mental health treatment without including treatments that are otherwise prohibited for gender transitioning.
The amendment adds language to clarify that the bill does not intend to restrict psychological or psychiatric treatment for gender dysphoria.
The amendment removes the phrase 'Chloe's law-' from the bill's catch title.
The amendment adds a new section (d) to the bill, stating that the provisions of the bill should not affect psychological or psychiatric treatment for gender dysphoria.