Why they voted this way
The lawmaker believes it is unfair for mineral owners not to be notified when surface ownership changes and states he will vote against the bill if this notification requirement is deleted.
State Lands - Notice for Lease Sales
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 6, 6:05 AM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker believes it is unfair for mineral owners not to be notified when surface ownership changes and states he will vote against the bill if this notification requirement is deleted.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that the bill's original intent was simply to provide notice for lease sales and that adding provisions about trading state lands violates this purpose. He states he would vote against the final bill if these additional sections are not removed.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
4 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
5 stored
The amendment modifies a bill to require notices to private subsurface owners and mineral lessees about proposed lease sales and trades involving state lands.
The amendment removes a previous amendment related to notice requirements for mineral leases involving state lands.
This amendment would require the state to give notice to private surface and subsurface owners, as well as mineral lessees, before leasing or selling state lands.
The amendment changes how to identify private surface owners by using the most recent property tax assessment roll instead of previous language.
The amendment modifies a bill to remove references to mineral lessees and certain sections related to lease sales involving state lands.