Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the second amendment because they believe 'demonstrated' implies reimbursement for costs already incurred, whereas the bill intends to forecast future cost efficiency.
Local Impact Assistance Payments
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 6, 3:47 PM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the second amendment because they believe 'demonstrated' implies reimbursement for costs already incurred, whereas the bill intends to forecast future cost efficiency.
R · H09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the second amendment because it holds counties accountable by requiring proof of their cost analysis before requesting millions in reimbursement, rather than allowing easy determinations.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
3 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
4 stored
The amendment requires persons constructing industrial facilities to contribute one-eighth of any impact assistance payments awarded and adds this requirement to existing laws.
The amendment changes how impact assistance payments are justified by requiring detailed explanations about why a certain dollar amount was chosen.
The amendment changes the word 'determined' to 'demonstrated' in two places of the bill.
The amendment changes the wording in several places to increase the percentage from one and three-quarter percent (1.75%) to two percent (2%), and replaces 'police department' with 'law enforcement'.