Why they voted this way
The lawmaker explained that the vote change resulted from clearing up a misunderstanding regarding the difference between microbrewery and malt beverage licenses.
Rules for State Investment in Real Property
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 11, 6:33 PM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker explained that the vote change resulted from clearing up a misunderstanding regarding the difference between microbrewery and malt beverage licenses.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure local communities have an opportunity for public input before any land purchase occurs.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges a no vote because the bill acts as an unlimited blank check for retaining experts without proper legislative limits or sufficient information on the assets.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it allows the executive branch to evaluate potential land purchases and brings any purchase agreement back to the legislature for an affirmative vote, ensuring legislative oversight.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because he believes Trona is not an energy sector asset, diversifying the portfolio further, and that the current owner's negative cash flow presents a buying opportunity.
H31
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker leans toward supporting the bill because he wants the legislature to have a seat at the table in determining criteria for any potential land swap or purchase rather than letting the board decide alone.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill as it functions like a comparative market analysis to determine property value and options, while also providing an opportunity for the state to control its destiny rather than allowing international buyers.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because he views this potential investment as similar to past state investments that successfully transformed Wyoming's economy and could be a future economic driver.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
6 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
13 stored
The amendment adds a requirement for the board to hold at least one public meeting in Wyoming before purchasing property there.
The amendment changes the requirement for approving real property purchases from legislative adjournment to legislative approval.
The amendment adds a new requirement for reporting potential anticipated earnings from the assets to be purchased by the state, including details about the sources and types of these earnings.
This amendment makes several minor changes to the bill, including correcting terminology and adjusting wording in specific sections.
The amendment adds a requirement for the board to hold at least one public meeting in Wyoming if they are purchasing property there.
The amendment makes several minor changes to the bill, including correcting terminology and adjusting wording in specific sections.
The amendment removes a specific line from the bill on page 2, which was proposed by Representative Gray.
The amendment adds a requirement for public meetings in Cheyenne, Wyoming if state funds are used to purchase property there.
The amendment approves the adoption of Substitute No. 1 for HB 0249.
The amendment to HB0249 makes several technical changes to the bill's language regarding the purchase and management of state funds.
The amendment modifies the bill to require public notice and comment periods before purchases, change references from singular to plural where appropriate, and add provisions regarding federal grants and management of purchased assets.
The amendment limits the amount of money that can be spent from a specific account for purchasing real property assets.
The amendment modifies certain sections of HB0249 to clarify language, remove redundant text, and add requirements for public disclosure and legislative approval before purchasing real property assets.