Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2020Vetoed

SF0097

Born Alive Infant Care Act

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

This bill requires doctors to provide standard medical care for infants born alive during an abortion and protects parents from legal responsibility if a doctor follows these rules.

What it does

  • Requires doctors to use common medical practices when caring for babies who are born alive during an abortion procedure.
  • Imposes duties on physicians performing abortions to take medically appropriate and reasonable steps to preserve the life and health of any infant born alive.
  • Exempts parents from criminal or civil liability for actions taken by a physician under this section.

Who it affects

  • Doctors who perform abortions
  • Parents of infants born alive during an abortion

Limits and unknowns

  • The bill was vetoed by the governor on March 30, 2020.
  • It is unclear if lawmakers will try to override this veto or pass a similar law in the future.

Plain language

Terms to know

Commonly accepted means of care
Standard medical practices used for any newborn baby.

Official record

Sources

Validated

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 11, 6:33 PM

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes reducing penalties to a misdemeanor because failing to treat a viable baby born alive after an attempted abortion is a severe offense that should remain a felony.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:29:41 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to reduce felony penalties because physicians in rural areas need protection from severe prison sentences when making difficult medical decisions under stress.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:31:31 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment by citing national statistics showing that many babies born alive after abortion attempts have been killed or allowed to die without medical assistance.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:33:37 Watch the statement

Landon Brown

R · H09

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes passing legislation without data showing that this specific problem exists in Wyoming, viewing it as a solution looking for a problem.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:35:30 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes reducing penalties to a misdemeanor, arguing that knowingly taking the life of a born-alive baby should be prosecuted as a felony.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:36:39 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes reducing penalties to a misdemeanor, stating that the offense is very serious and downgrading it would damage the bill.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:36:58 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes reducing penalties, arguing that even one instance of a born-alive baby being harmed is too many and requires strict enforcement.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:39:59 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes Division One because it grants criminal immunity to a physician based on parental request, which he views as an unusual and disturbing principle contrary to the criminal code.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:43:10 Watch the statement

Eric Barlow

R · H03

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports Division One because it clarifies that care requirements apply specifically to aborted infants and corrects a disparity where physicians could be liable for following parental directions.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:45:19 Watch the statement

Mike Yin

D · H16

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that without a 'chance of survival' standard, doctors would be forced to bet their careers on determining if an infant with no chance of survival should receive life-preserving care.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:56:20 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports keeping lines one through two because they establish a standard where care for an infant born alive depends on the baby's condition rather than the parent's wishes.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:00:57 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because adopting it prevents the deletion of language requiring commonly accepted means of care for infants born alive from the bill's enacting clause.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:01:57 Watch the statement

Art Washut

R · H36

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes a standard of reasonableness will encourage medical professionals to err on the side of caution and provide care for infants in borderline cases.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:03:00 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker explains his vote against the bill based on personal experience with a family member who works as an OBGYN nurse and neonatal practitioner. He believes medical decisions regarding infants should be made between doctors, patients, or nurses rather than by legislation.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:14:35 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

7 roll calls

H 3rd Reading:Passed 44-16-0-0-02020-03-11 · House44 yes 16 no
Amendment failed 21-39-0-0-02020-03-11 · House21 yes 39 no
Amendment failed 17-43-0-0-02020-03-11 · House17 yes 43 no
H01 - Judiciary:Recommend Do Pass 6-3-0-0-02020-03-06 · House6 yes 3 no
S 3rd Reading:Passed 23-7-0-0-02020-02-27 · Senate23 yes 7 no
S10 - Labor:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 4-1-0-0-02020-02-24 · Senate4 yes 1 no
S Introduced and Referred to S10 - Labor 22-7-1-0-02020-02-12 · Senate22 yes 7 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. Governor Vetoed SEA No. 0052 Governor
  2. Veto Message Received
  3. H Speaker Signed SEA No. 0052House
  4. S President Signed SEA No. 0052Senate
  5. Assigned Number SEA No. 0052LSO
  6. H 3rd Reading:Passed 44-16-0-0-0House
  7. H 2nd Reading:PassedHouse
  8. H COW:PassedHouse
  9. H Placed on General FileHouse
  10. H01 - Judiciary:Recommend Do Pass 6-3-0-0-0House
  11. H Introduced and Referred to H01 - JudiciaryHouse
  12. H Received for IntroductionHouse
  13. S 3rd Reading:Passed 23-7-0-0-0Senate
  14. S 2nd Reading:PassedSenate
  15. S COW:PassedSenate
  16. S Placed on General FileSenate
  17. S10 - Labor:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 4-1-0-0-0Senate
  18. S Introduced and Referred to S10 - Labor 22-7-1-0-0Senate
  19. S Received for IntroductionSenate
  20. Bill Number AssignedLSO

Changes

Amendments

7 stored

SF0097H2001

The amendment proposes to remove newly added language from the bill SF0097, which relates to public health and safety.

SF0097H3001

The amendment modifies the bill to remove certain requirements and insert new penalties for violations related to the treatment of infants born alive during abortions.

SF0097H3001.01

The amendment adds a provision that protects physicians from criminal and civil liability when they take actions requested by the parents of an infant born alive.

SF0097H3001.02

The amendment adds penalties for violating the requirements related to the treatment of infants born alive during abortions.

SF0097H3001.03

The amendment removes parts of the bill that require specific care for infants born alive and replaces them with new language.

SF0097H3002

The amendment withdraws a previous change and reverts the bill to its original form before that change was made.

SF0097SS001

The amendment removes the word 'all' from a specific line in the bill.