E-cigarette Product Directory
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 1:05 AM
D · H45
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker believes the bill is not ready for implementation because it has become too complicated through amendments. She suggests pausing to have deeper discussions with community members, public health officials, and businesses before proceeding.
R · H09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a compromise to address business concerns about open vaping systems and to remove a previous provision that conflicted with federal law. He views it as better than nothing despite not being his preferred solution.
H33
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it deletes a previous provision she believes ensures fairness across all proponents of the bill. She views the change as an attempt to disadvantage smaller businesses.
R · H61
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it removes refillable vapes, which he considers the least wasteful option, from the registry. He argues that the method of nicotine administration does not justify this exclusion.
D · H16
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues against the amendment because it creates an uneven playing field by exempting specific types of e-cigarettes rather than manufacturers. He states he would vote no on both the amendment and the bill to maintain fairness.
R · H47
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because extending the enforcement date provides time to fix potential loopholes. He believes it is acceptable for the state to set a higher standard than federal law.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because it is not ready for implementation given that many products are awaiting FDA approval. She emphasizes respecting local store owners who have expressed concerns about the legislation.
R · H04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because they feel the timing is premature without a proper federal list from the FDA, making the regulatory approach convoluted.
R · H58
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes restrictions because they believe adults over age 21 should have the right to vape, noting it is likely safer than cigarettes which are not banned.
R · H09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill to create a mechanism for holding retailers liable if they sell illicit products that evade federal approval processes, which currently has no prohibition on state books.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because they find it illogical to regulate harmful products in order to continue selling them, especially when many are manufactured cheaply overseas.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe federal agencies are currently unable to approve products timely due to a backlog and pending lawsuits, making this approach unsuitable at present.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because he believes it is a form of regulatory capture designed to give Big Tobacco a competitive advantage over other vape industry players.
R · S31
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill due to concerns about arbitrary criteria in the directory requirements, specifically citing a provision where having the wrong haircut could result in being listed.
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because it uses an arbitrary date for FDA application submission to unfairly exclude competitors who have not yet received approval.
R · S18
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill despite its flaws, hoping that health and safety concerns are urgent enough to pass it now with the expectation that problematic sections regarding market capture will be removed in the other chamber.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill to protect consumers from dangerous, unapproved products and notes that similar directories already exist for tobacco and alcohol.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because products are entering Wyoming without customs oversight, leaving constituents and small businesses unaware of what is in vape cartridges. He argues a manufacturer-funded registry will help track these imports and address health concerns involving young people.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
8 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
8 stored
The amendment to SF0107H2001 makes several technical changes by deleting specific lines and phrases in the bill text.
The amendment removes certain language about tobacco products and adds new requirements for non-tobacco nicotine e-cigarette and vapor material products.
The amendment removes a specific line from the bill's original text, which is part of a larger act about e-cigarettes and vapor products.
The amendment adds definitions to the bill for 'electronic cigarette', 'open-system electronic cigarette', and 'vapor material'.
The amendment changes specific dates in the bill from 2025 to 2026.
The amendment changes the frequency of certain actions from biannual to every two years in the bill.
The amendment changes the deadlines for certain actions related to electronic cigarettes and vapor materials from October 1, 2024, to January 1, 2025, and February 1, 2025.
The amendment adds an appropriation of $362,948 from the general fund to the Department of Revenue for creating a certification portal and enforcing regulations on electronic cigarettes and vapor materials.