Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2025Did Not Pass

HB0168

Ban on Lab-Grown Meat

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

This act prohibits the manufacture, sale and distribution of lab-grown meat for human consumption in Wyoming.

What it does

  • Prohibits anyone from manufacturing, selling, or distributing cultivated meat for human consumption.
  • Defines 'cultivated meat' as meat grown entirely in a laboratory using animal cells.
  • Requires the Department of Agriculture to create rules to enforce this ban.

Who it affects

  • People who make, sell, or distribute lab-grown meat
  • The Wyoming Department of Agriculture

Limits and unknowns

  • This bill did not pass and was not signed into law.
  • The effective date of the act, if it had passed, would have been July 1, 2025.

Plain language

Terms to know

Cultivated Meat
Meat that is grown entirely in a laboratory from animal cells.

Official record

Sources

Validated

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 5, 2:38 AM

Cale Case

R · S25

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that cultivated meat is not a real threat because it is federally regulated, safe, and unlikely to be consumed by anyone in Wyoming. They also state the bill violates the Constitution's interstate commerce clause and would lead to losing lawsuits.

Public statementFloor statement at 22:58 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because it interferes with free trade, which contradicts their core beliefs.

Public statementFloor statement at 25:15 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker believes the bill violates the interstate commerce clause and undermines free market principles by allowing legislators to pick products for market leverage instead of letting consumers decide.

Public statementFloor statement at 25:55 Watch the statement

Tim French

R · S18

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe it infringes on the free market and represents an improper government attempt to legislate what people eat.

Public statementFloor statement at 27:12 Watch the statement

Jim Anderson

R · S28

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that picking winners and losers in food manufacturing is not the government's role, noting that existing labeling laws already inform consumers.

Public statementFloor statement at 28:31 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe it takes away constituents' ability to make their own decisions about what products to buy, provided there are correct packaging laws.

Public statementFloor statement at 29:32 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues against the bill by pointing out an inconsistency with a previous vote on a beef labeling bill that also removed consumer choice.

Public statementFloor statement at 30:53 Watch the statement

Eric Barlow

R · S23

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe current statutes already define meat as coming from animals, meaning cultivated meat is not recognized and adding a prohibition creates an unnecessary barrier to trade.

Public statementFloor statement at 32:34 Watch the statement

Julie Jarvis

R · H57

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports an amendment to specify the bill applies only to human consumption in order to avoid stifling future technological innovation.

Public statementFloor statement at 29:58 Watch the statement

Daniel Singh

R · H61

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker explains that the bill, as amended, prohibits cells for human consumption to protect agricultural industries.

Public statementFloor statement at 31:40 Watch the statement

Paul Hoeft

R · H25

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe it undermines the bill's goal of keeping people safe from a product that is not well understood.

Public statementFloor statement at 33:21 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

4 roll calls

S 3rd Reading:Failed 12-19-0-0-02025-02-20 · Senate12 yes 19 no
S05 - Agriculture:Recommend Do Pass 4-1-0-0-02025-02-13 · Senate4 yes 1 no
H 3rd Reading:Passed 42-17-3-0-02025-02-04 · House42 yes 17 no
H05 - Agriculture:Recommend Do Pass 8-1-0-0-02025-01-28 · House8 yes 1 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. S 3rd Reading:Failed 12-19-0-0-0Senate
  2. S 2nd Reading:PassedSenate
  3. S COW:PassedSenate
  4. S Placed on General FileSenate
  5. S05 - Agriculture:Recommend Do Pass 4-1-0-0-0Senate
  6. S Introduced and Referred to S05 - AgricultureSenate
  7. S Received for IntroductionSenate
  8. H 3rd Reading:Passed 42-17-3-0-0House
  9. H 2nd Reading:PassedHouse
  10. H 2nd Reading:Laid BackHouse
  11. H COW:PassedHouse
  12. H Placed on General FileHouse
  13. H05 - Agriculture:Recommend Do Pass 8-1-0-0-0House
  14. H Introduced and Referred to H05 - AgricultureHouse
  15. H Received for IntroductionHouse
  16. Bill Number AssignedLSO

Changes

Amendments

4 stored

HB0168H2001

The amendment to HB0168 adds requirements that cultivated meat must be authorized as safe for human consumption by both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and a state department before it can be manufactured, sold, or distributed.

HB0168H3001

The amendment adds the phrase 'for human consumption' after the word 'meat' in three places within the bill.

HB0168H3002

The amendment to HB0168 removes the prohibition on manufacturing cultivated meat and changes penalties related to its sale, focusing instead on regulating state agencies and local governmental entities.

HB0168SW001

The amendment removes the phrase 'entirely in a laboratory' from the bill text.