Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2025Inactive

HB0258

State Funding for Capital Construction Projects

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

HB0258 provides funding and authorizations for various capital construction projects in Wyoming.

What it does

  • Defines key terms related to state-funded capital construction, such as 'appropriation', 'federal funds', and 'private funding sources'.
  • Allocates specific amounts of money from different accounts for various capital construction projects across the state.
  • Authorizes the State Construction Department to hire temporary staff to manage these projects.
  • Transfers $115 million from the legislative stabilization reserve account to the strategic investments and projects account.

Who it affects

  • The State Construction Department
  • Local governments receiving grants for capital construction projects

Limits and unknowns

  • The bill is marked as inactive, meaning it will not move forward in the current session.
  • Specific details about project completion and fund usage are not provided beyond what is outlined in the act.

Plain language

Terms to know

appropriation
Money authorized by the legislature to be spent on specific projects.
matching funds
Funds from non-state sources that must accompany state appropriations for certain projects.

Official record

Sources

Validated

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 5, 3:39 AM

Bob Nicholas

R · H07

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker votes in favor because the legislature's function includes helping communities that cannot fully help themselves, especially when they must raise matching funds first.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:34:36 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment as fiscally responsible because it requires the community to raise matching funds first and includes provisions for returning unspent money.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:35:56 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because colleagues from Sweetwater have shown due diligence in trying to make the project happen.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:37:00 Watch the statement

Lloyd Larsen

R · H54

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker encourages support because the funding aligns with previous decisions to rally behind communities facing similar problems.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:38:59 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because the building is old, not ADA compliant, and needs work to save history.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:44:02 Watch the statement

Art Washut

R · H36

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it uses a fund created by tourists specifically for projects honoring veterans.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:46:01 Watch the statement

Bob Davis

R · H47

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it addresses necessary maintenance on a facility that needs to be brought into compliance.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:47:03 Watch the statement

Mike Schmid

R · H20

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker votes against the amendment because property tax issues should be fixed before spending on special projects.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:48:05 Watch the statement

Gary Brown

R · H41

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it uses tourism funds paid largely by non-residents, which is unrelated to property taxes.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:48:44 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker votes against the amendment, comparing it to a used car offer he would not accept.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:53:17 Watch the statement

Mike Yin

D · H16

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment as a reasonable compromise to help fund the State Fair arena, proposing a two-to-one state match rather than asking for half from the county.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:00:57 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment as a compromise that helps the State Fair continue planning after they found ways to generate some of their own funding.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:02:14 Watch the statement

John Bear

R · H31

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker votes no because the amendment diverts funds from an account established for tourism purposes, which this project does not fulfill.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:09:01 Watch the statement

J.T. Larson

R · H17

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it is logical to use funds from an account that will receive significant contributions from workers in his county over the next few years.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:09:20 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because non-resident workers will fill hotels and contribute to the account, making it appropriate for them to help fund the project.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:09:42 Watch the statement

Cody Wylie

R · H39

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker urges a favorable vote because his county contributes significantly to the tourism reserve annually and needs assistance for construction projects that will also promote travel.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:10:42 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the current amendment because it takes all $18 million instead of adhering to a previous agreement to split funding between two sources.

Public statementFloor statement at 16:14 Watch the statement

Abby Angelos

R · H03

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker recommends voting no on the museum funding because the Office of Tourism did not formally present this request to the committee.

Public statementFloor statement at 28:32 Watch the statement

Art Washut

R · H36

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the project because developing the museum will help educate young people about the sacrifices of past generations.

Public statementFloor statement at 31:34 Watch the statement

Mike Yin

D · H16

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment as a necessary way to address community needs and avoid hamstringing other communities by denying this specific project.

Public statementFloor statement at 44:57 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment, stating that while communities have many needs, his choice is to prioritize tax relief over this specific project.

Public statementFloor statement at 50:13 Watch the statement

Liz Storer

D · H23

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because renovating downtown Rock Springs is critical for creating a vibrant community that attracts residents and visitors.

Public statementFloor statement at 51:33 Watch the statement

Cody Wylie

R · H39

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment as an urgent investment needed to address long-standing flood issues in Rock Springs, which will enable future economic growth and revenue generation.

Public statementFloor statement at 53:53 Watch the statement

Andrew Byron

R · H22

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment, arguing that delaying action will result in a much larger problem later when houses are lost.

Public statementFloor statement at 55:12 Watch the statement

Rob Geringer

R · H42

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment, suggesting that while he feels for the community, there may be other ways to address the flooding issues rather than this specific proposal.

Public statementFloor statement at 57:34 Watch the statement

Lloyd Larsen

R · H54

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment by comparing it to previous state investments in other resource-rich communities that needed infrastructure help despite their tax contributions.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:00:56 Watch the statement

J.T. Larson

R · H17

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because the funds come from a rainy day fund which is appropriate given that severe rain causes flooding problems in Rock Springs.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:02:38 Watch the statement

Tomi Strock

R · H06

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because enclosing the arena would create a hub for educational programs and events benefiting youth, while also helping the State Fair become self-sufficient by generating revenue year-round.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:07:38 Watch the statement

John Bear

R · H31

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because he views it as a new expenditure that was denied by the executive branch, arguing for fiscal responsibility and treating the budget strictly.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:08:38 Watch the statement

JD Williams

R · H02

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill as an investment in a booming community, believing it will enhance financial sustainability and economic impact by allowing year-round operations.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:09:19 Watch the statement

Bob Nicholas

R · H07

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill after touring the site, viewing the arena as a vital backbone for the State Fair and an important project for Wyoming.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:11:17 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because he views the State Fair as an educational tool and believes a year-round program is a good plan for the community.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:12:36 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because she has seen kids and others use the facility, believing that if they work to generate funds for the arena, her district would support it.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:13:36 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure a new prison can be built, arguing that pulling from the fund now will result in a higher price tag later.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:20:23 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

9 roll calls

H 3rd Reading:Passed 56-5-1-0-02025-01-30 · House56 yes 5 no
Amendment failed 19-42-1-0-02025-01-30 · House19 yes 42 no
Amendment failed 13-48-1-0-02025-01-30 · House13 yes 48 no
Amendment adopted 53-8-1-0-02025-01-30 · House53 yes 8 no
Amendment adopted 53-8-1-0-02025-01-30 · House53 yes 8 no
Amendment failed 23-38-1-0-02025-01-30 · House23 yes 38 no
Amendment failed 30-31-1-0-02025-01-30 · House30 yes 31 no
Amendment failed 24-37-1-0-02025-01-29 · House24 yes 37 no
H02 - Appropriations:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 7-0-0-0-02025-01-23 · House7 yes 0 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. S:Died in Committee Returned Bill Pursuant to SR 5-4Senate
  2. S No report prior to CoW CutoffSenate
  3. S Introduced and Referred to S02 - AppropriationsSenate
  4. S Received for IntroductionSenate
  5. H 3rd Reading:Passed 56-5-1-0-0House
  6. H 2nd Reading:PassedHouse
  7. H COW:PassedHouse
  8. H Placed on General FileHouse
  9. H02 - Appropriations:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 7-0-0-0-0House
  10. H Introduced and Referred to H02 - AppropriationsHouse
  11. H Received for IntroductionHouse
  12. Bill Number AssignedLSO

Changes

Amendments

16 stored

HB0258H2001

The amendment adds a new section to allocate $18 million from the Wyoming State Penitentiary Capital Construction Account for state-funded capital construction projects.

HB0258H2002

The amendment adds funding for the renovation of the Wyoming Veterans' Memorial Museum, allocating $5 million from the Wyoming tourism reserve and projects account.

HB0258H2003

The amendment adds a grant for local government capital construction and provides $11 million from the legislative stabilization reserve account to fund half of the costs of segment two of the Bitter Creek revitalization project in Rock Springs or Sweetwater County.

HB0258H2004

The amendment adds a new program called 'AGR – Silver Arena' to the bill and increases the General Fund amount by $27,041,438.

HB0258H2005

The amendment removes a previous amendment and adjusts funding allocations for state-funded capital construction projects.

HB0258H3001

The amendment adds a grant for local government capital construction and specifies funding for the Bitter Creek revitalization project in Rock Springs or Sweetwater County.

HB0258H3002

The amendment adds funding for the renovation of the Wyoming Veterans' Memorial Museum.

HB0258H3003

The amendment adds funding for the renovation of the Wyoming Veterans' Memorial Museum, requiring matching funds from nonstate sources.

HB0258H3004

The amendment changes the amount of money appropriated for state funded capital construction from $154,303,404 to $115 million.

HB0258H3005

The amendment adds funding for a project called 'AGR – Silver Arena 3' and sets conditions on how the money can be spent.

HB0258H3006

The amendment adds a grant for local government capital construction, specifically funding the Bitter Creek Revitalization project in Rock Springs or Sweetwater County.

HB0258HW001

The amendment increases the appropriation for state-funded capital construction projects related to demolitions and utility relocation at correctional facilities in Wyoming.

HB0258HW002

The amendment adds a grant for local government capital construction and provides $22 million from the legislative stabilization reserve account to fund part of the Bitter Creek revitalization project in Rock Springs or Sweetwater County.

HB0258HS001

This amendment to HB0258 removes certain lines from the bill and adjusts funding amounts.

HB0258HS001.01

The amendment changes references in the bill from plural to singular for appropriations and projects.

HB0258HS001.02

The amendment reduces a specific funding amount in the bill by $9 million.