Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2025Enacted

HB0259

Supplemental K-12 School Facilities Funding

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

This act provides funding for various K-12 school building and facility projects, including construction, demolition, and maintenance, and requires reporting on project progress.

What it does

  • Provides $206,901,896 from the Public School Foundation Program Account to fund various K-12 school facilities projects.
  • Allocates funds for major maintenance projects, transportation facility construction, high school building design and construction, and demolition of existing buildings in Campbell County School District #1.
  • Reappropriates up to $13.4 million previously allocated but not yet spent to cover inflationary costs for approved projects.

Who it affects

  • School districts in Wyoming, particularly Campbell County School District #1 which receives significant funding.
  • The State Construction Department and the School Facilities Commission responsible for managing these funds and reporting on their use.

Limits and unknowns

  • The act does not specify how funds will be allocated if projects are completed ahead of schedule or under budget.
  • It is unclear what specific impacts the study on directing expenditures for major maintenance projects might reveal.

Plain language

Terms to know

Public School Foundation Program Account
A fund used to support various educational initiatives in Wyoming's public schools.
School Facilities Commission
An agency responsible for overseeing the construction and maintenance of school facilities in Wyoming.

Official record

Sources

Validated

Official summary

Bill Summary - 25LSO-0596 Bill No.: HB0259 Effective: Immediately LSO No.: 25LSO-0596 Enrolled Act No.: HEA No. 0075 Chapter No.: 118 Prime Sponsor: House Appropriations Committee Catch Title: Supplemental K-12 school facilities appropriations-2. Has Report: Yes Subject: K-12 Public school facilities appropriations. Summary/Major Elements: This act provides funding for K-12 school buildings and facilities. The act requires development of an estimated schedule for deployment of appropriations for funded projects and reporting on deployment and project progression to the Select Committee on School Facilities, the Joint Appropriations Committee and the Governor. The act appropriates $206,901,896 from the Public School Foundation Program Account to the School Facilities Commission for the following projects and amounts: $29,832,716 for component level major maintenance projects. $14,473,224 for construction and demolition of a transportation facility ancillary building. $150,884,528, of which $20,000,000 is effective immediately and $130,884,528 is effective March 15, 2026, for design, construction, site preparation, and demolition for a high school building and facility. $11,711,428.00 for unanticipated costs for these component level major maintenance, construction and demolition projects. The act reappropriates up to $13,400,000 that was appropriated by 2023 Wyo. Sess. Laws, Ch. 94, from the School Capital Construction Account to the School Facilities Commission to supplement prior appropriations for approved inflationary costs. The act directs the State Construction Department and the School Facilities Commission to study the State Construction Department directing expenditures and supervising K-12 school major maintenance projects and the potential impacts on the agency and specified school districts. The report is due to the Joint Appropriations Committee and the Select Committee on School Facilities by October 1, 2025 and each October 1 thereafter until October 1, 2031. Comments: Requires reporting. The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill.

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 5, 3:39 AM

Ken Clouston

R · H32

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because it secures funding that allows construction to begin at least eight months earlier than if delayed another year.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:17:25 Watch the statement

Bob Nicholas

R · H07

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because fully funding or obligating funds before starting is required by construction management standards to ensure projects actually begin.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:18:25 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because they view it as a wise example of expediting work in a timely manner.

Public statementFloor statement at 4:56:44 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because it addresses significant concerns about state funding while ensuring new schools are built for children through careful decision-making.

Public statementFloor statement at 4:57:22 Watch the statement

Jim Anderson

R · S28

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe it is a good product resulting from effective legislative work.

Public statementFloor statement at 4:58:21 Watch the statement

Troy McKeown

R · S24

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe it is time to complete the project.

Public statementFloor statement at 4:58:40 Watch the statement

Eric Barlow

R · S23

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports Amendment Four because it initiates an examination of maintenance and construction costs, which could lead to policy adjustments that save money.

Public statementFloor statement at 5:07:52 Watch the statement

Bill Landen

R · S27

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports Amendment Four because they believe the State Construction Department can help explore a different direction for school facilities management.

Public statementFloor statement at 5:09:33 Watch the statement

Gary Crum

R · S10

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because the amendments brought it together, addressing concerns about broken promises and potential economic instability.

Public statementFloor statement at 5:12:17 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because continuing current spending levels will force tax increases and does not improve education quality.

Public statementFloor statement at 5:16:01 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because a recent court case makes the specific school project absolutely necessary as it is not currently usable.

Public statementFloor statement at 5:18:03 Watch the statement

Bob Ide

R · S29

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that approving the bill is necessary to save money by addressing immediate infrastructure needs like roofs, sewers, and HVAC systems before they cause more expensive problems.

Public statementFloor statement at 5:20:40 Watch the statement

Eric Barlow

R · S23

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker argues against removing design and construction funds because delaying funding risks projects falling through, citing historical examples where schools waited years between planning and construction phases.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:07:36 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports voting against the amendment because they believe it is better to wait for accurate cost information after planning is complete rather than funding construction prematurely.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:10:01 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker urges a vote against the amendment because they believe decoupling design and construction funding is bad policy that leads to delays, arguing that full funding should be approved now.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:13:46 Watch the statement

Tim Salazar

R · S26

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports voting no on the amendment to sustain the Senate Appropriations Committee's recommendation, citing fiscal constraints and the need for a cautious approach.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:14:30 Watch the statement

Stacy Jones

R · S13

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports funding schools every single year because many are unsafe and the state is too far behind in maintenance to delay further.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:15:29 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports the amendment to fund design and construction together now, arguing that delaying funding breaks the process and ignores previous commitments made by the legislature.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:17:54 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports a cautious, step-by-step approach because fully funding schools before they are ready is unsustainable and allows districts to manipulate the system.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:21:15 Watch the statement

Bill Landen

R · S27

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports the current process based on trust in the Select Committee's vetted recommendations, though acknowledges the difficulty of deciding whether to delay or fund immediately.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:22:12 Watch the statement

Gary Crum

R · S10

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports funding now because every project request they have heard from intelligent experts indicates the money is desperately needed immediately.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:27:46 Watch the statement

Tim French

R · S18

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that delaying the bill would harm a school currently needing facilities work, noting that contractors are available now but may not wait until next year's budget session. They urge colleagues to fix systemic issues without penalizing an existing broken school.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:37:47 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

8 roll calls

H Concur:Passed 62-0-0-0-02025-03-05 · House62 yes 0 no
S 3rd Reading:Passed 23-8-0-0-02025-03-04 · Senate23 yes 8 no
Amendment adopted 31-0-0-0-02025-03-04 · Senate31 yes 0 no
Amendment adopted 24-7-0-0-02025-03-04 · Senate24 yes 7 no
Amendment failed 15-16-0-0-02025-03-03 · Senate15 yes 16 no
S02 - Appropriations:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 5-0-0-0-02025-02-26 · Senate5 yes 0 no
H 3rd Reading:Passed 59-1-2-0-02025-01-28 · House59 yes 1 no
H02 - Appropriations:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 7-0-0-0-02025-01-23 · House7 yes 0 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. Assigned Chapter Number 118LSO
  2. Governor Signed HEA No. 0075 Governor
  3. S President Signed HEA No. 0075Senate
  4. H Speaker Signed HEA No. 0075House
  5. Assigned Number HEA No. 0075LSO
  6. H Concur:Passed 62-0-0-0-0House
  7. H Received for ConcurrenceHouse
  8. S 3rd Reading:Passed 23-8-0-0-0Senate
  9. S 2nd Reading:PassedSenate
  10. S COW:PassedSenate
  11. S Placed on General FileSenate
  12. S02 - Appropriations:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0Senate
  13. S Introduced and Referred to S02 - AppropriationsSenate
  14. S Received for IntroductionSenate
  15. H 3rd Reading:Passed 59-1-2-0-0House
  16. H 2nd Reading:PassedHouse
  17. H COW:PassedHouse
  18. H Placed on General FileHouse
  19. H02 - Appropriations:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 7-0-0-0-0House
  20. H Introduced and Referred to H02 - AppropriationsHouse

Changes

Amendments

11 stored

HB0259H2001

The amendment adds funding for specific school construction projects in Campbell County School District #1, including a high school, transportation facility, and demolition costs.

HB0259H2002

The amendment changes specific funding allocations for school construction and demolition projects in Campbell County School District #1.

HB0259H3001

The amendment changes funding allocations for school construction and demolition projects in Campbell County School District #1.

HB0259HW001

The amendment removes an existing provision and adds new funding for specific school construction projects in Campbell County School District #1.

HB0259HS001

The amendment adds new funding for the design of a high school in Campbell County School District #1 and specifies conditions for using this money.

HB0259S2001

The amendment proposes to remove an existing Senate amendment from HB0259, which relates to school building and facility projects.

HB0259S3001

The amendment changes a reference in the bill to update it from one section of law to another.

HB0259S3002

The amendment changes funding allocations for school facility projects in Campbell County School District #1, including a transportation ancillary building and a high school building.

HB0259S3003

The amendment changes the amount of money allocated for school building projects by increasing it from $4,380,121 to $79,380,121 and clarifies that this funding covers construction, site preparation, and demolition.

HB0259S3004

The amendment adds a requirement for a study on whether the state should directly manage expenditures for major repairs and replacements of K-12 public school buildings, with reports to be submitted annually until October 1, 2031.

HB0259SS001

The amendment modifies the appropriations for school building and facility projects by deleting certain lines and inserting new funding amounts.