Tom Kelly
R · H30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes that while helping vulnerable people is important, using a constitutionally questionable method to do so is not justified.
Settlement Agreements for Minors - Parental Authorization
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Bill Summary - 25LSO-0129 Bill No.: SF0010 Effective: 7/1/2025 LSO No.: 25LSO-0129 Enrolled Act No.: SEA No. 0080 Chapter No.: 142 Prime Sponsor: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee Catch Title: Settlement agreements for minors-parental authorization. Has Report: No Subject: Establishing a settlement process for minors without court approval. Summary/Major Elements: This act establishes a process by which a parent, guardian, or conservator of a minor may enter into a settlement on behalf of the minor without first seeking court approval or establishing a guardianship or conservatorship for the minor. To proceed under the process established in this act, the settlement must be less than twenty‑five thousand dollars ($25,000.00), and the parent must affirm that the minor's claim does not exceed twenty‑five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or that recovery on the claim would not exceed twenty‑five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). The act provides a cause of action to a minor against a parent or guardian who fails to manage or apply all settlement funds received or who fails to make a reasonable inquiry into the minor's claim before settling. This act amends the value of property that a parent may accept on a minor's behalf from three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) to twenty‑five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) and amends the value of property that may be paid or delivered to a minor from five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) to twenty‑five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 5, 1:48 AM
R · H30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes that while helping vulnerable people is important, using a constitutionally questionable method to do so is not justified.
R · H27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it addresses a top concern in their district regarding an oversight in the supplemental budget that affects many people.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe that if rules must be bent, this situation involving important funding for vulnerable populations is an appropriate time to do so.
D · H45
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe ignoring specific sections of the Constitution erodes the document and harms its ability to serve the people.
R · H03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe failing to pass it will leave adults who cannot care for themselves without necessary respite care workers.
R · H36
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe extending the timeline for termination of parental rights creates an unnecessary delay in establishing permanency for children when parents have already been found unfit.
D · H13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe waiting an extra year for permanency is unnecessary when parents have been found unfit, and stability benefits children.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
5 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
2 stored
The amendment adds a new section to allocate money for health care services and changes when certain parts of the bill take effect.
The amendment changes the source of funding from the general fund to the legislative stabilization reserve account for certain payments.