Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2025Enacted

SF0152

Amendments for Wildfire Management

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

This act amends wildfire management duties, provides funding for wildfire suppression and restoration, and allows borrowing from a reserve account to fight wildfires.

What it does

  • Changes the State Forester's job to include managing wildland fire control programs.
  • Gives money to restore funds used by the state in fighting wildfires that happened in 2024.
  • Lets the Governor borrow up to $30 million from a reserve account if needed to fight wildfires when other funds are gone.
  • Appropriates two million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($2,750,000.00) for contract and direct fire response positions at the Office of State Lands and Investments.
  • Provides grants to restore vegetation on lands damaged by wildfires.

Who it affects

  • The State Forester
  • Governor
  • Office of State Lands and Investments

Limits and unknowns

  • The bill does not specify how borrowed funds will be repaid.
  • It is unclear if the grants provided will cover all restoration needs after wildfires.

Plain language

Terms to know

State Forester
A person appointed by the state board to manage forestry activities.
Legislative Stabilization Reserve Account
An account used for financial stability and emergencies in Wyoming.

Official record

Sources

Validated

Official summary

Bill Summary - 25LSO-0663 Bill No.: SF0152 Effective: Immediately LSO No.: 25LSO-0663 Enrolled Act No.: SEA No. 0062 Chapter No.: 129 Prime Sponsor: Barlow Catch Title: Wildfire management-amendments. Has Report: Yes Subject: Wildfire management. Summary/Major Elements: Amends the duties of the State Forester to include maintaining wildland and forestry fire control programs. Provides appropriations to restore funds expended by the state to suppress wildfires that occurred in 2024. Authorizes the Governor to borrow up to thirty million dollars ($30,000,000.00) from the Legislative Stabilization Reserve Account as necessary to meet funding requirements to fight wildfires in the event the reserves have been exhausted. Appropriates two million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($2,750,000.00) to and authorizes one (1) full-time and four (4) part-time positions for, the Office of State Lands and Investments for contract and direct fire response. Appropriates forty‑nine million four hundred seventy‑nine thousand five hundred sixty‑four dollars ($49,479,564.00) to the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resource Trust Income Account to provide grants to various special districts and the Game and Fish Commission for restoring grass, hay and other vegetation, prevent invasive vegetation and restore habitats on state and private lands destroyed by wildfires. Comments: Requires the Governor to report to the Joint Appropriations Committee, the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives upon borrowing from the Legislative Stabilization Reserve Account as authorized to fight wildfires. The Governor exercised line‑item vetoes in this act. Originally, the enrolled act: Authorized the State Loan and Investment Board to make loans totaling up to one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000.00) from the Legislative Stabilization Reserve Account for wildfire mitigation and restoration. Reverted funds related to providing energy related matching funds. Repealed language that but for the line‑item veto would have been redundant borrowing authority. Required the Office of State Lands and Investments to report on revenues and expenditures in relation to loans authorized for wildfire restoration not later than October 15 of each year the loan program is in operation to the Joint Appropriations Committee and the Joint Agriculture, State and Public Lands and Water Resources Interim Committee. The above summary is not an official publication of the Wyoming Legislature and is not an official statement of legislative intent. While the Legislative Service Office endeavored to provide accurate information in this summary, it should not be relied upon as a comprehensive abstract of the bill.

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 5, 8:21 AM

Eric Barlow

R · S23

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that the bill merges two previous files with some discrepancies in funding sources and amounts, suggesting concurrence now to allow for later technical corrections via a ballpoint pen amendment.

Public statementFloor statement at 46:42 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes creating a new task force, believing existing assets are sufficient to conduct necessary after-action reviews of fire incidents.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:13:54 Watch the statement

Ken Clouston

R · H32

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports the amendment because it allows time for discussion during the summer while retaining the option to establish a task force later if needed.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:15:15 Watch the statement

Bob Davis

R · H47

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes collaborative task forces produce better processes and input than relying on a single committee.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:15:55 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The speaker opposes removing the task force because she believes it is essential for taking a holistic approach and gathering diverse perspectives after widespread fire damage.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:16:35 Watch the statement

Abby Angelos

R · H03

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker notes that while she struggles with the amendment, the bill also addresses critical issues regarding state Forester duties and budget requests beyond just the task force.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:20:12 Watch the statement

Ivan Posey

D · H33

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes a task force is needed to address poor forest health and inevitable large fires.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:26:27 Watch the statement

Andrew Byron

R · H22

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports keeping the task force because having members with firefighting expertise on it would be beneficial for addressing the state's fire situation.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:27:51 Watch the statement

Lloyd Larsen

R · H54

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes standing committees are better suited as subject matter experts to address gaps in state government roles regarding wildfires.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:30:30 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes removing the task force because a recent survey identified statewide resource gaps that require experts to solve through policy changes.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:33:27 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it improperly inserts a budget position into this bill, which he views as unconstitutional and unprecedented. He argues that funding new programs by defunding other sections of the passed budget is bad strategy and changes the original intent of the legislation.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:59:55 Watch the statement

Mike Yin

D · H16

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes turning this legislation into a supplemental budget bill sets a bad precedent and creates constitutional issues regarding line-item veto authority. He argues that making every bill a budget bill wastes time and gives the governor excessive power to strike specific funding items.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:06:03 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because adding these items muddies up the original bill's intent, believing it should have been a separate budget item.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:18:35 Watch the statement

Jayme Lien

R · H38

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe firefighters need these specific resources.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:19:34 Watch the statement

John Bear

R · H31

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because they believe it aligns with fire mitigation goals, specifically regarding grants for noxious weeds and helicopter support.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:21:35 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to provide necessary air support and funding for noxious weeds, citing recent severe fires in their community.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:26:08 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

9 roll calls

S Concur:Passed 26-5-0-0-02025-02-28 · Senate26 yes 5 no
H 3rd Reading:Passed 46-14-2-0-02025-02-26 · House46 yes 14 no
Amendment adopted 34-26-2-0-02025-02-26 · House34 yes 26 no
Amendment adopted 31-29-2-0-02025-02-26 · House31 yes 29 no
Amendment adopted 32-27-3-0-02025-02-26 · House32 yes 27 no
H02 - Appropriations:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 7-0-0-0-02025-02-20 · House7 yes 0 no
S 3rd Reading:Passed 24-6-1-0-02025-02-06 · Senate24 yes 6 no
S02 - Appropriations:Recommend Do Pass 5-0-0-0-02025-01-30 · Senate5 yes 0 no
S06 - Travel:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 5-0-0-0-02025-01-28 · Senate5 yes 0 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. Assigned Chapter Number 129LSO
  2. Governor Signed SEA No. 0062 Governor
  3. H Speaker Signed SEA No. 0062House
  4. S President Signed SEA No. 0062Senate
  5. Assigned Number SEA No. 0062LSO
  6. S Concur:Passed 26-5-0-0-0Senate
  7. S Received for ConcurrenceSenate
  8. H 3rd Reading:Passed 46-14-2-0-0House
  9. H 2nd Reading:PassedHouse
  10. H COW:PassedHouse
  11. H Placed on General FileHouse
  12. H02 - Appropriations:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 7-0-0-0-0House
  13. H Introduced and Referred to H02 - AppropriationsHouse
  14. H Received for IntroductionHouse
  15. S 3rd Reading:Passed 24-6-1-0-0Senate
  16. S 3rd Reading:Laid BackSenate
  17. S 2nd Reading:PassedSenate
  18. S COW:PassedSenate
  19. S Placed on General FileSenate
  20. S02 - Appropriations:Recommend Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0Senate

Changes

Amendments

9 stored

SF0152H3001

The amendment removes specific sections related to a task force and state forester, renumbers remaining sections, and deletes certain lines from the bill.

SF0152H3002

The amendment authorizes the state to make loans from a reserve account for wildfire and disaster recovery, sets limits on loan amounts and timing, and adjusts how funds revert to the budget reserve account.

SF0152H3003

The amendment changes how wildfire management funds are allocated and adds new provisions for grants and employee positions.

SF0152HW001

This amendment changes the wording in two places from 'He' to 'The state forester'.

SF0152HS001

The amendment changes the number of committee members and reduces funding from $40 million to $30 million.

SF0152S2001

The amendment reduces certain appropriations in the bill by one dollar for every dollar appropriated from specific sources for wildfire management purposes.

SF0152SS001

The amendment changes the number of representatives and senators involved in wildfire management, updates their regional representation requirements, alters committee composition, and increases financial thresholds.

SF0152SS001.01

The amendment changes the date for a certain action to November 15th and increases funding from $30 million to $40 million.

SF0152SS001.02

The amendment changes the number of representatives and senators involved in wildfire management from two to four each, specifies that these individuals must represent different regions of the state, and increases a funding amount from $25,000 to $40,000.