Property Tax Changes for Homes
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 5, 3:31 AM
R · S23
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because it adds a significant tax reduction that is not backfilled, placing an unabsorbable financial burden on local governments and school foundations.
R · S13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the concurrence because not all communities experienced high property tax increases, and further reductions would unfairly take money from local coffers.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes concurrence because most of their constituents do not support the measure and they believe more discussion is needed regarding the specific tax rate chosen.
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes concurrence because the bill disproportionately benefits wealthy counties and homeowners while failing to provide a thoughtful strategy for local government impacts.
R · S12
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes concurrence because they believe the bill goes too far and that communities are not uniform enough to justify a blanket approach.
R · H17
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports Amendment Four because he believes it offers a fair approach to backfilling property tax losses for all counties utilizing their full mill levy.
D · H16
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports Amendment Five to prevent unintended consequences from passing two separate tax cut bills simultaneously without accounting for the cumulative impact on local governments.
R · H31
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes Amendment Five because he believes passing the bill without the amendment would result in an excessive total tax reduction that could lead to corporations raising prices on consumers.
R · H02
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports Amendment Five because he believes it prevents unintended consequences regarding local government funding, even though it removes his own amendment.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports Amendment Five as a safety net that ensures the bill can pass without going to conference committee while maintaining alignment with constitutional requirements if another tax cut bill is signed.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
7 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
13 stored
The amendment to SF0153 adds the word 'beneficial' before the term 'owner' in a specific line of the bill.
The amendment removes references to property ownership and residency, changing how residential real property is described for tax purposes.
The amendment changes the property tax assessment rate for residential real property from nine and one-half percent to eight and three-tenths percent.
The amendment changes the property tax assessment rate for residential real property from nine and one-half percent to nine and eight-tenths percent.
The amendment adds a new section requiring the Department of Revenue to establish a grant program funded by $72 million from the legislative stabilization reserve account for counties with reduced residential property tax assessments.
The amendment adds an appropriation of $10.5 million from the general fund to the Department of Revenue for a property tax refund program.
The amendment adds a new section requiring rulemaking and an appropriation for property tax relief in qualifying counties.
The amendment adds a provision for appropriating $72 million from the legislative stabilization reserve account to compensate counties for reductions in tax revenues due to changes in property tax assessment rates.
The amendment adds a new condition to the existing text that would change how residential real property is taxed if certain other bills become law.
The amendment changes the property tax assessment rates for residential real property, offering a lower rate for owner-occupied primary residences.
The amendment changes the property tax rates for residential real estate in a specific way.
The amendment changes the property tax assessment rate for residential real property from 9.5% to 8.3%, and adds an exemption for active duty armed forces members deployed outside the state.
The amendment changes the wording of the bill to adjust certain property tax assessment rates for residential real property.