Clarifying Rules About Crossing Parcels
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 1:58 PM
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker is concerned the amendment is too restrictive because survey markers are often missing, which would unfairly restrict access to public land corners that can be identified by other means.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill to address public lands being locked up by out-of-state owners, which prevents constituents from hunting and hinders wildlife management.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes passing the bill now, arguing it creates a win-lose scenario and that more time is needed to find a solution acceptable to both sportsmen and landowners.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it clarifies that corner crossing is not a crime, aligns with court rulings and constituent desires for access to public lands.
R · S01
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because it grants a variance for trespassing without clear boundaries, which they view as an unconstitutional taking of private property.
R · S29
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe it legislates trespass and creates a slippery slope for abuses regarding property lines.
R · S13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker reiterates opposition because multiple groups consistently expressed dislike for the bill during interim meetings and committee work.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
5 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
4 stored
Withdrawn 3rd reading by Representative Williams
Adopted Standing Committee by House Travel, Recreation, Wildlife and Cultural Resources Committee
Adopted Committee of the Whole by Senator Landen
Failed Standing Committee by Senate Travel, Recreation, Wildlife and Cultural Resources Committee