Second Amendment Protection Act Amendments
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 6, 12:53 AM
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to replace 'interested party' with 'agrieved party' because the current term lacks a clear legal definition, which could allow out-of-state individuals or others not directly harmed to file lawsuits. Narrowing the definition ensures only those who have suffered actual harm can litigate.
R · S01
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker states they will vote against the bill because every law enforcement officer in their district opposes it, and they choose to stand with local officers rather than national lobbyists.
R · S10
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because it could punish police officers for following federal laws, which conflicts with their pledge of allegiance and oath to follow the US government.
R · S02
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports standing with local law enforcement officials who are against the bill due to potential negative impacts on their operations, leading them to vote no.
R · S28
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker explicitly states they will vote against the bill to maintain a low rating from gun owner organizations, despite owning many guns themselves.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because they believe local law enforcement should not assist federal agents in seizing firearms, viewing the Second Amendment as a check against excessive federal power.
R · S06
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker states they will support the bill sponsored by their president rather than this version if forced to choose between them.
R · H36
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker voted against the bill because they believe it is ambiguous and complex, which could lead to differing interpretations over time. They also expressed concern that well-intentioned law enforcement officers might face civil liability under this legislation.
R · H49
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it clarifies that state officers cannot be forced to enforce federal gun bans, thereby protecting Second Amendment rights.
R · H36
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because an existing law already provides adequate protections and this new measure sends a message that local officers cannot be trusted.
R · H04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill as a necessary continuation of existing Second Amendment protections and to establish civil penalties after last year's veto.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
6 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
7 stored
Adopted Committee of the Whole by Representative Haroldson
Corrected, Adopted Standing Committee by House Appropriations Committee
Adopted 2nd reading by Senator Hicks
Adopted 3rd reading by Senator Hicks
Corrected, Failed 3rd reading by Senator McKeown
Adopted Committee of the Whole by Senator Biteman
Failed Standing Committee by Senate Revenue Committee