Larry Hicks
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker explains that the bill restores statutory authority for the governor to profile a percentage of funds, which is substantively similar to historical practices under the repealed SIPA account.
Repealing Strategic Investments and Projects Account
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 12:43 AM
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker explains that the bill restores statutory authority for the governor to profile a percentage of funds, which is substantively similar to historical practices under the repealed SIPA account.
R · H54
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the second amendment because it ensures stability by allowing the full five percent spending policy to go to the general fund, protecting against revenue shortfalls.
R · H31
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the second amendment because a guaranteed spending rate would force the reserve account to be drained quickly if investment returns fall short, undermining long-term financial stability.
R · H17
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the second amendment because failing to pass it would mean locking funds in an inaccessible account, forcing future cuts that could have been avoided by using investments now.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the third amendment because he wants to maintain a five percent spending guarantee split between the general fund and the reserve account, even though it still eliminates SIPA.
R · H17
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because he believes the current account has served the state well by clearly funding specific projects like schools and facilities without being secretive.
R · H59
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker reiterates opposition, arguing the bill restricts revenue needed for current services and school construction by draining the legislative stabilization reserve account.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it simplifies the budgetary process by eliminating a convoluted method of funneling money, thereby increasing transparency.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
7 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
7 stored
Failed 2nd reading by Representative Harshman
Adopted 3rd reading by Representative Bear
Failed 3rd reading by Representative Larson, JT
Failed 3rd reading by Representative Harshman
Adopted 2nd reading by Senator Steinmetz
Withdrawn Committee of the Whole by Senator Gierau
S Failed Veto Override